드러리 레인 플레이빌 연구(2): 셰리단의 전략

A Study of Drury Lane’s Playbill(2): Sheridan’s Strategy

초록

This article focuses on three tasks to look into Sheridan’s strategy toward Drury Lane’s playbill of 29 Jan. 1781, consisting of Garrrick’s Florizel and Perdita and Sheridan’s pantomime, Robinson Crusoe and Harlequin Friday. First, to stage Whig political propaganda, Sheridan chose Florizel and Perdita as it became associated with the inappropriate love affair of Prince of Wales and the actress who played the role of Perdita, Mary Robinson. Second, Sheridan intended to satire inappropriateness of George III’s foreign affairs and the Tory policies promoting the legitimacy of the hereditary power. Thus he chose DeFoe’s novel as an Opening of the first part of his pantomime as it was a text embodying both European colonial and nationalist rhetoric, symbolic of beating Spain out of the New World. Third, to upstage George III and the Tory and their policies, Sheridan finally downstaged an uncanny resemblance between the fundamental traits of Friday/Harlequin and himself. Friday/Harlequin/Sheridan humiliated Spanish culture and religion which its contemporary audience would have recognized as the satires of the Tory. Thus after the premiere of the playbill of 1781, Sheridan began to be considered as Harlequin advocating constitutional authority and representative government, middle class values and abolition.

키워드

셰리단드러리 레인플레이빌『플로리젤과 퍼디타』『로빈슨 크루소 혹은 할리퀸 프라이데이』Richard Brinsley SheridanDrury LaneplaybillFlorizel and PerditaRobinson Crusoe or Harlequin Friday
제목
드러리 레인 플레이빌 연구(2): 셰리단의 전략
제목 (타언어)
A Study of Drury Lane’s Playbill(2): Sheridan’s Strategy
저자
전준택
DOI
10.17009/shakes.2018.54.1.002
발행일
2018
저널명
Shakespeare Review
54
1
페이지
27 ~ 52