Cross-cultural validation of factor structure in the Japanese Counselor Burnout Inventory

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

11
Citations

SCOPUS

13

초록

This article describes the cross-cultural validation of the Counselor Burnout Inventory (CBI; Lee, Baker, Cho, Heckathorn, Holland, Newgent, Ogle, Powell, Quinn, Wallace & Yu, 2007) on a sample of professional counselors and psychotherapists in Japan. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine the validity of the CBI with three models: a one-factor model, a five-factor model, and a second-order model. The results showed that the five-factor model was a better fit and more parsimonious than both the one-factor model and the second-order factor model. Additionally, the internal consistency reliability for the CBI subscale scores proved equivalent to that found for other populations (e. g. American and Korean). The results suggest that counselor burnout is not a unidimensional construct but a multidimensional construct. Implications and recommendations for future research are provided.

키워드

counselor burnoutscale developmentcross-cultural validationQUESTIONNAIREPERSONALITYPSYCHOLOGYWORKERS
제목
Cross-cultural validation of factor structure in the Japanese Counselor Burnout Inventory
저자
Yagi, Darryl TakizoLee, JayoungPuig, AnaLee, Sang Min
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-5884.2011.00469.x
발행일
2011-09
유형
Article
저널명
Japanese Psychological Research
53
3
페이지
281 ~ 291