Do Students Distinguish Between Different Types of Performance Goals?

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

57
Citations

SCOPUS

60

초록

The authors tested whether multiple components of a performance goal were differentiated by a group of Korean middle school students (N = 239). Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the normative and outcome components as well as the approach and avoidance components correlated too highly to be considered independent. A 2-factor model with a mastery goal and a performance goal most parsimoniously illustrated students' achievement goal responses. In structural equation modeling, these 2 achievement goals functioned as conduits between perceived learning contexts and preference for course difficulty. Mastery goals were predicted positively by perceptions of school mastery goal structures and negatively by perceived importance of ability for academic success. Performance goals were positively predicted by perceptions of both school mastery and school performance goal structures with the latter demonstrating substantially stronger predictive power. Mastery goals in turn positively predicted preference for challenging courses, whereas performance goals positively predicted preference for easy courses.

키워드

achievement goal dichotomyclassroom goal structuregoal theorylearning environmentsstructural equation modelingACHIEVEMENT GOALSIMPLICIT THEORIESAVOIDANCE MOTIVATIONLEARNING-ENVIRONMENTHIERARCHICAL MODELMIDDLE SCHOOLHELP-SEEKINGCLASSROOMPERCEPTIONSBELIEFS
제목
Do Students Distinguish Between Different Types of Performance Goals?
저자
Bong, MimiWoo, YeonkyoungShin, Jiyoun
DOI
10.1080/00220973.2012.745464
발행일
2013-10-02
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of Experimental Education
81
4
페이지
464 ~ 489