WHEN WOMEN ARE DISSATISFIED: GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PRODUCT FAILURE ATTRIBUTION

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

5
Citations

SCOPUS

6

초록

We studied whether or not men and women respond differently to product failure by investigating how the level of satisfaction changes according to the failure severity and the locus of causality. We conducted an experiment with 2 types of failure attribution (company or consumer) and 2 different levels of failure severity (less severe or severe) with 237 participants. Results showed that, when product failure was severe, the women had lower satisfaction than the men did for consumer-caused failure, but not for company-caused failure. Utilizing a defensive attribution framework, we ran a mediation analysis to identify why such differences occur. The analysis suggested that defensive motivation, whereby the individual avoids self-blame for severe failure, was heightened more for women than for men. Our findings suggest that, when a product failure is consumer-caused, companies must react more rapidly when managing female consumers than when managing male ones. Further, companies should carefully consider recovery strategies that mitigate dissatisfaction, even for less severe company-caused failure.

키워드

gender; failure attribution; outcome severity; satisfaction; CONSUMER ATTRIBUTIONS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; SERVICE ENCOUNTERS; BRAND PERSONALITY; SEVERITY; BLAME; RESPONSIBILITY; JUDGMENTS; RESPONSES; RECOVERY
제목
WHEN WOMEN ARE DISSATISFIED: GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PRODUCT FAILURE ATTRIBUTION
저자
Song, Sujin; Sheinin, Dan A.; Yoon, Sukki
DOI
10.2224/sbp.6169
발행일
2017-09
유형
Article
저널명
Social Behavior and Personality
권
45
호
8
페이지
1397 ~ 1408