Errors in Thickness Comparison Maps From 3D Optical Coherence Tomography

  • Park, Jin-Hwan
  • Oh, Jaeryung
  • Yang, Kyung-Sook
  • Kim, Seong-Woo
  • Huh, Kuhl
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

1
Citations

SCOPUS

1

초록

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To study characteristics of errors in thickness comparison maps (TCMs) from three-dimensional optical coherence tomography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent three-dimensional optical coherence tomography examinations were included. Errors in TCM were categorized into several types according to common features, and the origins and distributions of errors were investigated. RESULTS: Errors were observed in 25 (22.9%) of 109 TCMs with a normal macula and in 88 (63.3%) of 139 TCMs with an abnormal macula (P < .001). The errors were categorized into three types: horizontal line-shaped errors that originated from fixation loss by the examinee, jumping errors caused by segmentation error, and two-peaked errors due to mismatching. There were significant differences in the distributions of the error types among different diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Errors in TCM were categorized into several types according to common features. Distributions of these types differed among eyes according to diagnosis. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2012;43:275-283.]

키워드

DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMARETINAL THICKNESSPHOTODYNAMIC THERAPYDEGENERATIONHEALTHYDOMAINREPRODUCIBILITYINSTRUMENTSRETINOPATHYSTRATUS
제목
Errors in Thickness Comparison Maps From 3D Optical Coherence Tomography
저자
Park, Jin-HwanOh, JaeryungYang, Kyung-SookKim, Seong-WooHuh, Kuhl
DOI
10.3928/15428877-20120618-05
발행일
2012-07
유형
Article; Proceedings Paper
저널명
Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging
43
4
페이지
275 ~ 283