상세 보기
Differential Prognostic Impact of Treatment Strategy Among Patients With Left Main Versus Non-Left Main Bifurcation Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Results From the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II
- Song, Young Bin;
- Hahn, Joo-Yong;
- Yang, Jeong Hoon;
- Choi, Seung-Hyuk;
- Choi, Jin-Ho;
- ... Yu, Cheol Woong;
- ... Rha, Seung Woon;
- 외 11명
WEB OF SCIENCE
62SCOPUS
72초록
Objectives The authors sought to investigate whether the impact of treatment strategies on clinical outcomes differed between patients with left main (LM) bifurcation lesions and those with non-LM bifurcation lesions. Background Few studies have considered anatomic location when comparing 1- and 2-stent strategies for bifurcation lesions. Methods We compared the prognostic impact of treatment strategies on clinical outcomes in 2,044 patients with non-LM bifurcation lesions and 853 with LM bifurcation lesions. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization. Results The 2-stent strategy was used more frequently in the LM bifurcation group than in the non-LM bifurcation group (40.3% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.01). During a median follow-up of 36 months, the 2-stent strategy was not associated with a higher incidence of cardiac death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 2.14; p = 0.44), cardiac death or MI (HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.58 to 2.19; p = 0.73), or TLF (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.94; p = 0.06) in the non-LM bifurcation group. In contrast, in patients with LM bifurcation lesions, the 2-stent strategy was associated with a higher incidence of cardiac death (HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.05 to 5.59; p = 0.04), cardiac death or MI (HR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.04; p = 0.03), as well as TLF (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.60 to 3.55; p < 0.01). Significant interactions were present between treatment strategies and bifurcation lesion locations for TLF (p = 0.01). Conclusions The 1-stent strategy, if possible, should initially be considered the preferred approach for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, especially LM bifurcation lesions. (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting [COBIS] Registry II; NCT01642992) (C) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
키워드
- 제목
- Differential Prognostic Impact of Treatment Strategy Among Patients With Left Main Versus Non-Left Main Bifurcation Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Results From the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II
- 저자
- Song, Young Bin; Hahn, Joo-Yong; Yang, Jeong Hoon; Choi, Seung-Hyuk; Choi, Jin-Ho; Lee, Sang Hoon; Jeong, Myung-Ho; Kim, Hyo-Soo; Lee, Jae-Hwan; Yu, Cheol Woong; Rha, Seung Woon; Jang, Yangsoo; Yoon, Jung Han; Tahk, Seung-Jea; Seung, Ki Bae; Oh, Ju Hyeon; Park, Jong-Seon; Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
- 발행일
- 2014-03
- 유형
- Article
- 권
- 7
- 호
- 3
- 페이지
- 255 ~ 263
- 언어
- ENG
- 출판사
- ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
- 발행국가
- 미국
- 분량
- 9 페이지
- ISSN
- E 1876-7605
P 1936-8798