Reputation and Cooperation in Voluntary Exchanges: Comparing Local and Central Institutions

  • Ahn, T. K.
  • Esarey, Justin
  • ScholZ, John T.
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

24
Citations

SCOPUS

28

초록

our experimental study compares the effectiveness of three reputation mechanisms believed to enhance cooperation. Groups of 14 subjects repeatedly select partners, play two-person prisoner's dilemmas, and rely only on individual experience to find trustworthy exchange partners in the baseline condition. The local condition represents emergent, bottom-up networks that allow partners to voluntarily share recommendations. The central condition represents designed, top-down institutions that allow wide dissemination of recommendations provided voluntarily. Surprisingly, the greater provision and use of information in the local condition supports the highest level of cooperation, suggesting an unrecognized advantage of exchange networks over centralized institutions in credibility and information provision.

키워드

reputation cooperation prisoner's dilemmaREPEATED PRISONERS-DILEMMARATIONAL COOPERATIONINDIRECT RECIPROCITYREPEATED GAMESENFORCEMENTEVOLUTIONEQUILIBRIUMSUPERGAMESAUCTIONSSTRATEGY
제목
Reputation and Cooperation in Voluntary Exchanges: Comparing Local and Central Institutions
저자
Ahn, T. K.Esarey, JustinScholZ, John T.
DOI
10.1017/S0022381609090355
발행일
2009-04
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of Politics
71
2
페이지
398 ~ 413