Clinical outcome of statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction propensity-score matching analysis

초록

Background: It is unclear whether simvastatin-ezetimibe could be an alternative therapy to high-intensity statin therapy in high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of simvastatin-ezetimibe and high-intensity statin therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and especially in those with high-risk factor. Methods: A total of 3520 AMI patients in the KAMIR (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry) were classified into simvastatin-ezetimibe group (n=1249) and high-intensity statin group (n=2271). Multivariate analysis and propensity-score matching analysis were performed. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12-months follow-up. Results: In overall AMI patients, MACE occurred in 116 patients (9.3%) in simvastatin-ezetimibe group and 116 patients (5.1%) in high-intensity statin group. The difference in MACE between groups was driven by repeat revascularization (5.9% vs. 2.2%). After propensity matching analysis, simvastatin-ezetimibe was associated with a higher incidence of MACE than high-intensity statin therapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.090, 95% confidence interval: 1.715 to 5.566, p < 0.001). However, in patients with high-risk factors, such as diabetes, old age, or heart failure, simvastatin-ezetimibe had similar incidence of MACE compared with high-intensity statin therapy in further adjusted analysis. Conclusions: In overall AMI patients, high-intensity statin therapy had better clinical outcomes than simvastatin-ezetimibe. However, in patients with high-risk factor, simvastatin-ezetimibe had comparable clinical outcomes to high-intensity statin therapy. Therefore, simvastatin-ezetimibe could be used as an alternative to high-intensity statin therapy in such patients. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

키워드