ScholarWorks@Korea University: Kim, Yun Jae

Detailed Information

Kim, Yun Jae (김윤재)

College of Engineering

Research Area

Tel 02-3290-3372
Homepage

ResearcherID ORCiD Scopus Google Scholar ID ResearchGate

Keyword

Finite element analysis:32||Finite element damage analysis:19||Elbow:9||finite element analysis:9||Jintegral:8||Finite element limit analysis:7||finite element damage analysis:7||Failure assessment diagram:6||Experimental validation:6||Ductile fracture simulation:5||Largeamplitude cyclic loading:4||Small punch test:4||Infinite element:4||Fracture toughness prediction:4||Ablative layer:4||Dynamic yield strength:4||branch junction:4||Plasma:4||finite element limit analysis:4||Water tamping layer:4||Inplane bending:4||Ductile crack growth simulation:4||Limit load:4||PWSCC:4||Fracture mechanics analysis:4||Stressmodified fracture strain:4||limit load:4||Dissimilar Metal Weld:4||Ductile fracture:3||Circumferential crack:3||Throughwall cracked pipe:3||Multiaxial fracture strain model:3||Elasticplastic J:3||high cycle fatigue test:3||crack opening displacement:3||Vfactor:3||Internal pressure:3||Austenitic stainless steel:3||Reference stress approach:3||Elastic followup:3||C(t) integral:3||Fracture toughness estimation:3||Crack opening displacement:3||FE analysis:3||Fracture strain model:3||thin film:3||Finite Element Analysis:3||Ductilebrittle transition temperature:3||FE damage analysis:3||stressmodified fracture strain:3||Strain rate effect:2||Dropweight tear test:2||FE limit analysis:2||Cyclic hardening model:2||finiteelement analysis:2||Alloy 600:2||Mismatch limit load:2||twiceelasticslope:2||이종금속용접:2||multiaxial fracture strain model:2||Combined primary and secondary stresses:2||elbow:2||Preemptive Weld Overlay:2||Fracture simulation:2||ductile fracture:2||JR curve:2||Stress intensity factor:2||complex crack:2||Complex crack:2||Plastic influence functions:2||Alloy 600TT:2||Strength mismatch:2||local wall thinning:2||Thermal aging effect on fracture toughness:2||Alloy 690 steam generator tube:2||Effective fracture toughness:2||GE/EPRI method:2||creep mismatch:2||잔류 응력:2||Welding Residual Stress:2||Severe accident condition:2||Ductile tearing simulation:2||Crack tip stress fields:2||Thermal aging constant:2||Large amplitude cyclic loading:2||Multiple axial surface cracks:2||Plastic load:2||Limit pressure:2||Crack growth:2||Monotonic loading:2||Secondary loading:2||Fracture toughness:2||Defect assessment:2||welding residual stress:2||Reference stress:2||Creep crack initiation and growth:2||austenitic stainless steel:2||Cracked pipe test:2||Multiaxial fracture strain energy:2||Very lowcycle fatigue:2||cracktip stress fields:2||welded branch junctions:2||combined pressure and outofplane bending:2||Elastic stresses:2||plastic load:2||Residual Stress:2||Creep ductility:2||Interacting ductile and cleavage fracture:1||displacementcontrolled cyclic loads:1||excessive seismic loads:1||damage mechanics:1||Wide range of radiustothickness ratio:1||strainbased criteria:1||Complex cracked tension specimen testing:1||Crack tip stress field:1||Cyclic hardening model effect:1||Jestimation formula:1||Creep crack growth:1||Dynamic loads:1||Meshless:1||Normalizeddensity:1||piping system test:1||Electroplated Nickel Boron:1||Buried natural gas pipe:1||MaTangent Method(MaTangent):1||ASME Code(ASME):1||Internal Pressure:1||Nuclear Piping Materials:1||Seismic Condition:1||circumferential cracked pipe test simulation:1||Elasticplasticcreep:1||JIntegral:1||High strain rate condition:1||Multiaxial fracture strain locus:1||burst pressure prediction:1||R6:1||Limit Loads:1||Singleedgenotch tension specimen:1||SP:1||Control rod driving mechanism nozzles:1||Pressurized water reactors:1||Stress intensity factors:1||Creep elastic followup factor:1||Cruciform plate:1||Biaxial displacementcontrolled loading:1||Creep mismatch:1||Steadystate stresses:1||Jintegral estimates:1||Combined misalignment:1||Elastic crack opening displacement:1||Alloy 600 steam generator tube:1||Ductile failure simulation:1||NiCo alloy:1||combined tension and bending:1||limit bending moment:1||nonuniform thickness:1||mechanical properties:1||copper:1||inplane bending:1||이종 금속 용접:1||용접잔류응력:1||cast stainless steel CF8M:1||JR curve prediction:1||Cracked&nbsp:1||Cask drop analysis:1||Stress triaxiality:1||Damage model parameter determination:1||Validation using OLHF test:1||Viscoplastic FE analysis:1||plate structure:1||Adiabatic heating and strain rate effect:1||JohnsonCook deformation and fracture model:1||Failure prediction:1||API X80 dropweight tear test:1||Numerical fracture simulation:1||Alloy 690 steam generator Ubend tube:1||Piping systems:1||nuclear piping components:1||multiaxial fracture strain energy model:1||API X80 Charpy test:1||seismic design:1||Creep damage:1||Plastic damage:1||Multiaxial fracture strain:1||Jouleheating:1||Residual stiffness model:1||Linear Elastic Analysis:1||Limit Load:1||enhanced reference stress method:1||strain rate effect:1||SCC Growth Simulation:1||Fracture simulation of circumferential:1||Steam generator tube:1||A16:1||Collinear Circumferential Surface PWSCC:1||creep stresses:1||PE4710:1||experimental validation:1||Shot peening (SP):1||Welding residual stress:1||Strainbased:1||Hydrogenassisted stress corrosion cracking:1||Piezoelectric:1||Spiral beam:1||Elastic followup factor:1||Surge nozzle in pressurized water reactors:1||Circular specimen:1||weld overlay:1||Tensile properties measurement:1||Elasticplastic behaviour:1||Pressurised pipe:1||Circumferential cracks:1||Reinforced branch junction:1||일차수 응력부식균열:1||Sensitivity Analysis:1||StrengthMismatch(강도불일치):1||1차 하중:1||J 적분:1||hydrogenembrittlement effect:1||Notch fracture resistance:1||Applicability of thermal aging models:1||Vertical microprobe:1||Multilayered microstructure:1||Ductilebrittle fracture simulation model:1||Compact tension specimen:1||Very low cycle fatigue loading:1||Stress analysis:1||pit growth rate:1||Cyclic hardening FE debond analysis:1||fatigue and fracture prediction:1||finite and boundary element methods:1||Round robin analysis:1||Crack initiation:1||Wallthinned pipe with reinforcement:1||Element size effect:1||590MPa class thin plate steel:1||Load amplitude:1||Fracture strain:1||Thermal embrittlement:1||Drop weight tear test:1||Probability prediction of DWTT energy:1||ASME strainbased assessment method:1||Maximum load prediction:1||thickness:1||Hydrogenembrittlement:1||Failure behaviour:1||Very low cyclic fatigue test:1||Void growth and shrinkage effect:1||Nuclear pressure vessel:1||Elasticplastic FE analysis:1||Pitting corrosion:1||IVRERVC:1||Impact fracture simulation:1||Code coupling:1||Plastic collapse load estimation:1||Seismic load:1||Burst pressure:1||Transparent conductive oxides:1||Decoupling criterion:1||ultimatestrength tests:1||Reference stress based J estimation:1||triaxiality factor:1||elastoplastic seismic analysis:1||Fracture mechanics parameters:1||Strainbased fatigue assessment:1||Instability moment:1||Burst pressure estimation equations:1||Benchmark calculations:1||Blunt notch:1||Probe card:1||primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) mitigation:1||multiplecracked pipe:1||high strain rate condition:1||finiteelement damage analysis:1||Crack:1||Notched small punch test:1||elastic crack opening displacement:1||Computer simulation:1||Optimized reference load:1||Piping:1||Growth Behavior:1||Damage Mechanics:1||Life assessment:1||Combined mechanical and thermal loads:1||LSP:1||Pipe:1||InPlane bending:1||Branch junction:1||Bending:1||Partthrough crack:1||Welding residual stresses:1||Angular misalignment:1||NiCo thin film:1||Residual stress measurement:1||Ratchetting:1||Temperature and strength gradient:1||Combined pressure and inplane bending:1||Transient creep:1||C(t)integral:1||thickwalled branch junctions:1||circumferential throughwall cracked pipe:1||elbows:1||민감도 해석:1||Primary Stress:1||2차 하중:1||Current carrying capacity:1||multiaxial fracture strain locus:1||Large scale yielding:1||pipe:1||FE&nbsp:1||inelastic analysis:1||Ductile crack propagation simulation:1||Residual stress and plastic strain:1||Complex cracked pipe:1||Failure prediction of nuclear pressure vessel:1||Dynamic impact analysis:1||Combined ductile and brittle fracture mode:1||Inelastic strain energy density:1||Quantification of prestrain effect on fracture:1||Low cycle fatigue evaluation methods:1||Strength:1||Combined plastic and creep deformation model:1||Reinforced wallthinned pipe:1||API X52 steel:1||Ferritic stainless steel:1||Sodiumcooled fast reactor:1||chlorideinduced stress corrosion cracking:1||Mechanical reliability:1||Very low cycle fatigue:1||Axial cracked cylinder:1||Complex cracked tension specimen:1||Mesh density effect:1||Seismic loads:1||multiaxial fracture strain energy:1||simulated seismic loading:1||Parameter calibration:1||netsection collapse load approach:1||multiaxial fracture strain energy locus:1||finite element ductile fracture simulation:1||secondary stress:1||burst test:1||Combined mechanical and thermal loading:1||Circumferential throughwall crack:1||Damage Initiation Model:1||Plastic Instability:1||Steam Generator Tubes:1||FEA:1||Time parameter:1||Circumferential surface cracks:1||Laser source:1||throughwall welding residual stress profile:1||interacting throughwall cracked plates:1||Elastic stress intensity factor:1||Failure assessments:1||al3% ti alloy:1||finiteelement limit analysis:1||combined pressure and inplane bending:1||Finite Element Analysis(유한요소해석):1||Limit Load Analysis(한계하중해석):1||Joule heating:1||Cyclic Delta J integral:1||Monotonic fracture toughness:1||Incomplete penetration defect:1||Fatigue test:1||Efficient piping system stress analysis:1||Notched C(T) test:1||Energy based damage model:1||Throughwall cracked pipe test:1||Strain rate:1||Cracked pipe:1||Hydrogen embrittlement effect:1||Strain based ductile tearing simulation model:1||FE laser shock peening simulation:1||Elastic plastic finite element analysis:1||Ductile fracture mode:1||sversion of finite element method:1||Chloride induced stress corrosion cracking:1||Combined bending and torsion:1||Charpy test:1||1D nuclear system analysis code:1||Strain hardening due to the Ubending process:1||Transparent polyimide:1||Nanoscratch:1||Crack tip deformation:1||Elasticplastic seismic analysis:1||deformation and failure behaviors:1||Numerical simulation of interacting ductile and cleavage fracture:1||accumulated plastic strain:1||Piping system under seismic load:1||Load ratio effect:1||Cracked plate:1||SPH:1||Maximum pressure prediction:1||GTN model:1||Burst pressure estimation:1||Thin film tensile test:1||m(alpha)tangent Method:1||Banch:1||Cyclic Load:1||Loading Rate Effect:1||J(t) integral:1||plasticity correction term:1||transient creep:1||Cold working:1||Primary stress corrosion crack:1||Failure Assessment:1||heataffected zone:1||Creep crack growth rate:1||creep crack initiation time:1||modified NSW model:1||Shift function method:1||Loading sequence effect:1||Finite element welding residual stress analysis:1||Jgroove weld:1||Combined primary and secondary load:1||Creep:1||Plastic collapse load:1||Welded branch junctions:1||90 degrees Elbow:1||Safeend length effect:1||fracture strain model:1||Fe analysis:1||Initial yielding condition:1||finite element simulation:1||Cyclic thermal stresses:1||Multiple throughwall cracked plates and tubes:1||Large geometry change:1||Twiceelasticslope:1||MEMS:1||J testing:1||leakbeforebreak:1||일차수 응력 부식 균열:1||일차수응력부식균열:1||V계수:1||참조응력법:1||fracture toughness:1||Ductility:1||GTAW 316L stainless Steel:1||Load interaction effect:1||Creep fatigue:1||Very low cycle fatigue life evaluation:1||Very low cycle fatigue crack growth simulation:1||Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading:1||Combined ductile brittle fracture simulation:1||Fatigue evaluation:1||Thermal fatigue life test:1||Temperature effect:1||Fracture strain energy:1||Metallic fuel:1||dry storage canister:1||Flexible display:1||Circumferential surface cracked cylinder:1||Thermal aging effect:1||GTAW 316L stainless steel:1||Maximum principal stress criterion:1||fatigueinduced damage:1||Monotonic and cyclic loading:1||XFEM:1||Coldworked TP316L stainless steel:1||Cyclic loads:1||GPU parallelization:1||Pipe test:1||elasticplasticcreep condition:1||Local collapse load approach:1||laser shock peening:1||Alloy 600 penetration nozzle:1||Fracture Behavior:1||Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking (PWSCC):1||alloy 690 steam generator tube:1||failure pressure:1||stress intensity factor:1||Circumferential cracked vessel:1||Leakbeforebreak:1||Safety Class 1 Nuclear Components:1||PWSCC Initiation Model:1||Secondary stress:1||Beam:1||Residual strain:1||SP(Shot Peening):1||Mitred bends:1||Biaxial stress:1||Concentric misalignment:1||PWR pressurizer safety:1||relief nozzle:1||Shakedown:1||steadystate stresses:1||Combined mechanical and thermal stresses:1||Netsection limit load:1||tensile test:1||shakedown limit load:1||circumferential throughwall crack:1||reference stress method:1||C:1||Notch type and specimen thickness effect:1||Chevron notch:1||Nuclear safety class 1 components:1||Hydrogenembrittlement constant:1||Strain based acceptance criteria:1||GTAW and SMAW 316L stainless Steel welds:1||Unstable fracture load:1||Notched bar test:1||Throughwall cracked pipe with equivalent:1||Displacement controlled load:1||Strain based failure model:1||Combined plastic and creep constitutive model:1||Circumferential surface crack:1||Conventional and hybrid solder joint:1||Duplex stainless steel:1||Circumferential surface cracked pipe:1||Multi axial fracture strain model:1||LBLOCA severe accident:1||Class 2 and 3 nuclear piping:1||HydrogenEmbrittlement of API X52 pipe:1||Smoothed particle hydrodynamics:1||Invessel retention external reactor vessel cooling:1||Korean highpower reactor:1||Numerical simulation:1||Ultralow cycle fatigue (ULCF):1||Elasticplastic J estimation:1||Nuclear power plants:1||simulated specimen:1||finite element method:1||GursonTvergaardNeedleman model:1||Stressmodified fracture strain model:1||Complex crack shape:1||notched compact tension specimen:1||Multiple surface cracks:1||Ductile fracture model:1||Fatigue life evaluation:1||Creep Stress:1||R5 Code(R5):1||complex cracked pipe test simulation:1||stressmodified fracture strain model:1||Blunt defects:1||Virtual testing:1||elastic followup:1||cracked pipes:1||shape factor:1||Reference stress method:1||Slow Crack Growth:1||Pennsylvania Edge Notch Tensile(PENT):1||Strainbased Acceptance Criteria:1||analytical analysis:1||Slow crack growth:1||Laser shock peening:1||Secondary stress effect:1||ductile fracture simulation:1||elementsizedependent critical damage model:1||Finite element analysis (FEA):1||Laser shock peening (LSP):1||Multilayers:1||pressurised water reactors:1||ductile failure simulation:1||Tubular specimen:1||Ct integral:1||thickwalled elbow:1||Limit moment:1||plastic etafactor:1||pipe bend:1||Safe End:1||안전단:1||Secondary Stress:1||Creep crack tip constraint parameter:1||Stressmodified fracture strain energy density:1||stress magnitude effect:1||Cracked specimen:1||Severe seismic load:1||Variable sensitivity:1||Elastic stiffness:1||Canister:1||Johnsoncook model:1||90 degrees elbow pipe:1||Fatigue cracking location:1||Multipurpose canister:1||Energybased damage model:1||Irradiationembrittlement effect on fracture:1||fracture mechanics:1||PMMA:1||Equivalent pipe with the same stiffness:1||Cracked pipe bends:1||Outofplane bending:1||Atomic layer deposition:1||Load sequence effect:1||inelastic material model:1||Damage evaluation method:1||Complex throughwall crack:1||Ductility damage model:1||Alloy 690TT steam generator tube:1||cracktip constraint:1||transient creep conditions:1||Composite material sleeve:1||Inplane Bending:1||elasticplasticcreep:1||timedependent C(t) and J(t) estimation equations:1||Steam Generator Tube:1||Stress Triaxiality:1||multipleaxial partthroughwall flaws:1||steam generator tubes:1||interaction effect:1||Multiaxial fracture strain locus:1||High Density Polyethylene:1||Weld:1||Level D Service Loads:1||P91 martensitic steel:1||High density polyethylene:1||PE pipes:1||Shot peening:1||LSP(Laser Shock Peening):1||LSP(Laser shock peening):1||Thickwalled pipe:1||dissimilar metal nozzle butt welds:1||Large bore branch:1||Finite element welding simulation:1||Kinematic boundary condition effect:1||Reverse plasticity:1||Contour integral:1||Circumferential partthrough surface cracked pipe:1||Reference stress based J estimates:1||Probe:1||limit pressure:1||internal pressure:1||twiceelasticslope plastic load:1||예방 용접 오버레이:1||JIntegral(J적분):1||Reference Stress Method:1||Creep crack initiation time:1||316H creep crack growth data at 550 &#176:1||SMAW 316:1||Reliability:1||Press notch:1||Fatigue crack growth:1||pipe debonding analysis:1||Initiation of crack growth:1||Socket welded pipe:1||Finite element elasticplastic analysis:1||Load ratio:1||Approximate solutions:1||Pipe elbow:1||Small punch test in hydrogen:1||Fatigue crack growth simulation:1||3D highspeed crack propagation modelling:1||Conservatism in fatigue life evaluation:1||Failure simulation of nuclear pressure vessel:1||High power reactors:1||Dwelling time effect:1||Thermomechanical fatigue analysis:1||Viscoplasticity model:1||

RSS_1.0 RSS_2.0 ATOM_1.0

145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea+82-2-3290-2963

Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.

Detailed Information

Keyword

BROWSE