Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

On the Understood Object in EnglishOn the Understood Object in English

Other Titles
On the Understood Object in English
Authors
김정석
Issue Date
2014
Publisher
한국생성문법학회
Keywords
contextual anaphora; deep anaphora; inherent anaphora; object-omission; surface anaphora
Citation
생성문법연구, v.24, no.1, pp.83 - 104
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
생성문법연구
Volume
24
Number
1
Start Page
83
End Page
104
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/100116
DOI
10.15860/sigg.24.1.201402.83
ISSN
1225-6048
Abstract
In English, there are many verbs that are transitive by nature but aresometimes used without an object. These have been calledobject-omission verbs. This paper classifies them into two types:indefinite object-omission verbs (e.g., eat, read, write, etc.) and definiteobject-omission verbs (e.g., know, shake, understand, etc.). Hankamer andSag (1976) divide anaphora into two types, depending on the availabilityof linguistic or situational contexts: deep anaphora and surface anaphora. This paper proposes that the understood objects of object-omission verbsinduce two different types of anaphora, corresponding to two types ofobject-omission verbs: inherent anaphora and contextual anaphora. Wefurther propose that inherent anaphora is lexical, while contextualanaphora is either deep- or surface-anaphoric in the sense of Hankamerand Sag.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Liberal Arts > Department of English Language and Literature > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Jeong Seok photo

Kim, Jeong Seok
문과대학 (영어영문학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE