Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effect of Improvement in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Sexual Function in Men: Tamsulosin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and SolifenacinEffect of Improvement in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Sexual Function in Men: Tamsulosin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin

Other Titles
Effect of Improvement in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Sexual Function in Men: Tamsulosin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin
Authors
고경태양대열이원기김세웅문두건문기학박남철박종관손환철이성원현재석박광성
Issue Date
2014
Publisher
대한비뇨의학회
Keywords
Erectile dysfunction; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Overactive urinary bladder
Citation
Investigative and Clinical Urology, v.55, no.9, pp.608 - 614
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
Investigative and Clinical Urology
Volume
55
Number
9
Start Page
608
End Page
614
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/100329
ISSN
2466-0493
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate how much the improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS) affects sexual function and which storage symptoms or voiding symptoms havethe greatest effect on sexual function. Materials and Methods: A total of 187 patients were enrolled in this study. Patientswere randomly assigned to receive either tamsulosin 0.2 mg (group A) or tamsulosin0.2 mg and solifenacin 5 mg (group B). At 4 weeks and 12 weeks, the LUTS and sexualfunction of the patients were evaluated by use of the International Index of ErectileFunction-5 (IIEF5), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive BladderSymptom Score (OABSS) questionnaire, uroflowmetry, and bladder scan. Results: Both groups A and B showed statistically significant improvements in IPSS,OABSS, and quality of life (QoL). Group A showed improved maximum flow rate, meanflow rate, and residual urine volume by time. Group B did not show an improvementin flow rate or residual urine volume but total voiding volume increased with time. TheIIEF5 score was not improved in either group. In group A, the IIEF5 score dropped from13.66±4.97 to 11.93±6.14 after 12 weeks (p=0.072). Group B showed a decline in theIIEF5 score from 13.19±5.91 to 12.45±6.38 (p=0.299). Although group B showed a relativelysmaller decrease in the IIEF5 score, the difference between the two groups wasnot significant (p=0.696). Conclusions: Tamsulosin monotherapy and combination therapy with solifenacin didnot improve erectile function despite improvements in voiding symptoms and QoL. Theimprovement in storage symptoms did not affect erectile function.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Moon, Du Geon photo

Moon, Du Geon
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE