Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Do experimental auction estimates pass the scope test?

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLoureiro, Maria L.-
dc.contributor.authorGracia, Azucena-
dc.contributor.authorNayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-05T23:15:59Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-05T23:15:59Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-14-
dc.date.issued2013-08-
dc.identifier.issn0167-4870-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/102575-
dc.description.abstractScope insensitivity is a popular anomaly in many valuation studies. Although scope insensitivity is a problem that may be present in any valuation method, most previous literature has focused on evaluating scope sensitivity within the context of contingent valuation applications. Nevertheless, it is necessary to understand the demand-revealing properties of experimental auctions since they are increasingly used to value products, such as quasi-public goods. In this paper, we test explicitly whether estimates coming from experimental auctions may pass a scope test. We conduct experimental auctions on products with a subset of attributes (part) and a comprehensive set of attributes (whole) related to animal welfare using two multi-product auction approaches: sequential and simultaneous. Results show that estimates pass the scope test when multi-product auctions are conducted simultaneously but not when they are conducted sequentially for all valued products. Implications of these findings are discussed. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV-
dc.subjectFARM-ANIMAL-WELFARE-
dc.subjectWILLINGNESS-TO-PAY-
dc.subjectPUBLIC-GOODS-
dc.subjectCONTINGENT VALUATION-
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL VALUATION-
dc.subjectPREFERENCE REVERSALS-
dc.subjectVALUES-
dc.subjectIMPROVEMENTS-
dc.subjectBENEFITS-
dc.subjectVALIDITY-
dc.titleDo experimental auction estimates pass the scope test?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorNayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joep.2013.04.005-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84878210330-
dc.identifier.wosid000322093400002-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, v.37, pp.7 - 17-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY-
dc.citation.titleJOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY-
dc.citation.volume37-
dc.citation.startPage7-
dc.citation.endPage17-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaBusiness & Economics-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaPsychology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEconomics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPsychology, Multidisciplinary-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFARM-ANIMAL-WELFARE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusWILLINGNESS-TO-PAY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPUBLIC-GOODS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONTINGENT VALUATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusENVIRONMENTAL VALUATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPREFERENCE REVERSALS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusVALUES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPROVEMENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBENEFITS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusVALIDITY-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMulti-product auctions-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPreferences-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSequential-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSimultaneous-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorValuation-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology > Department of Food and Resource Economics > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE