Do experimental auction estimates pass the scope test?
- Authors
- Loureiro, Maria L.; Gracia, Azucena; Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.
- Issue Date
- 8월-2013
- Publisher
- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
- Keywords
- Multi-product auctions; Preferences; Sequential; Simultaneous; Valuation
- Citation
- JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, v.37, pp.7 - 17
- Indexed
- SSCI
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY
- Volume
- 37
- Start Page
- 7
- End Page
- 17
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/102575
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.joep.2013.04.005
- ISSN
- 0167-4870
- Abstract
- Scope insensitivity is a popular anomaly in many valuation studies. Although scope insensitivity is a problem that may be present in any valuation method, most previous literature has focused on evaluating scope sensitivity within the context of contingent valuation applications. Nevertheless, it is necessary to understand the demand-revealing properties of experimental auctions since they are increasingly used to value products, such as quasi-public goods. In this paper, we test explicitly whether estimates coming from experimental auctions may pass a scope test. We conduct experimental auctions on products with a subset of attributes (part) and a comprehensive set of attributes (whole) related to animal welfare using two multi-product auction approaches: sequential and simultaneous. Results show that estimates pass the scope test when multi-product auctions are conducted simultaneously but not when they are conducted sequentially for all valued products. Implications of these findings are discussed. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology > Department of Food and Resource Economics > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.