Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Ethnic Particularism and White Universalism in Native Speaker and AloftEthnic Particularism and White Universalism in Native Speaker and Aloft

Other Titles
Ethnic Particularism and White Universalism in Native Speaker and Aloft
Authors
신혜원
Issue Date
2013
Publisher
한국현대영미소설학회
Keywords
Chang-rae Lee; Native Speaker; Aloft; race; multiethnic; whiteness
Citation
현대영미소설, v.20, no.1, pp.175 - 198
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
현대영미소설
Volume
20
Number
1
Start Page
175
End Page
198
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/104754
DOI
10.22909/smf.2013.20.1.008
ISSN
1229-7232
Abstract
Chang-rae Lee’s first two novels, Native Speaker (1995) and A Gesture Life (1999), explicitly deal with the complex psychology of an Asian American man straddling two continents and two cultures. Native Speaker foregrounds the political aspect of Asian American experiences. Its main character, John Kwang, is an ethnic politician who not only seeks a particular voice for his own community but also wants to speak for American people as a whole. Lee employs a trope of visibility and invisibility for figuring ethnic specificity and white universalism, by contrasting the hypervisible “color” of the minority subject with the standard whiteness unnoticed. Although his third novel, Aloft (2004), delves into the mindscape of a white male living in Long Island suburbs, race is still the major issue. Lee questions the permeable white universality, as opposed to other races’ differences examined in the previous works. In Aloft, whiteness is self-consciously observed from the perspective of a wealthy Italian American, Jerry Battle. Unfortunately, Lee’s interrogation of whiteness is only half successful, since the white male patriarchy is ultimately upheld by the symbolic sacrifice of racial minorities. Jerry achieves redemption in exchange for the victimization of Korean Americans and Hispanic Americans. Both Native Speaker and Aloft illuminate the individuals’ response to the multiethnic and multicultural U.S. society, one from the perspective of a minority subject struggling with ethnic particularism, and the other from the perspective of a white male recognizing his whiteness no more universal. A comparison of the two novels brings to attention the limits of identity politics, while suggesting a changing viewpoint in exploration of race and ethnicity, with more emphasis on how race is perceived by both whites and nonwhites.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Liberal Arts > Department of English Language and Literature > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Shin, Hye won photo

Shin, Hye won
문과대학 (영어영문학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE