Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

급성허혈뇌졸중에서 혈전용해치료의 유효성과 안전성에 관한 예후모형 개발Prognostic Modeling for an Efficacy and a Safety of Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Other Titles
Prognostic Modeling for an Efficacy and a Safety of Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Authors
이지성이준영강지훈고영채박종무박태환이경복이수주조용진한문구배희준
Issue Date
2012
Publisher
대한신경과학회
Keywords
Acute ischemic stroke; Outcome; Prognostic model; Thrombolysis
Citation
대한신경과학회지, v.30, no.2, pp.100 - 109
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
대한신경과학회지
Volume
30
Number
2
Start Page
100
End Page
109
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/109968
ISSN
1225-7044
Abstract
Background: The aims of this study were to develop and internally and externally validate a prognostic model that can predict the benefit and harm of thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke and that may be used promptly in an emergency setting. Methods: The data of a consecutive series of patients who were hospitalized to Seoul National University Bundang Hospital within 12 hours of stroke onset between January 2004 and March 2008 and with relevant ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI were used to develop and internally validate the prognostic model. The external validation was performed using the data of patients from five participating centers of the Clinical Research Center for Stroke that had been collected between April 2008 and September 2009. The score on the modified Rankin Disability Scale at 3 months was selected to determine the efficacy outcome,and the occurrence of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation was used to evaluate the safety outcome. Prognostic models were constructed with logistic regression, and both internal and external validations were performed. Results: The discriminative abilities of the efficacy model (C statistic=0.880) and the safety prognostic model (C statistic=0.864)were confirmed. External validation of both models revealed remarkably little degradation in the discrimination power (C statistic=0.835 and 0.822 for the efficacy and safety models, respectively). Conclusions: This study shows that the efficacy and safety prognostic models developed with basic clinical variables were reliably validated with independent data. Both models may be helpful to clinicians in the emergency setting to identify patients who would benefit from thrombolysis.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE