Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Can Unions Grow in Authoritarian Political and Social Environments? The Korean Case

Authors
Jeong, Jooyeon
Issue Date
9월-2011
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
Keywords
comparative industrial relations; enterprise unionism in Korea; meso- and micro-socioeconomic theory
Citation
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, v.53, no.4, pp.504 - 521
Indexed
SSCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Volume
53
Number
4
Start Page
504
End Page
521
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/111679
DOI
10.1177/0022185611412906
ISSN
0022-1856
Abstract
In the English-language literature, the prevailing view on Korean unions during the period of economic development of the 1970s attributes the unions' lack of representative capacity as well as their exceptionally slow growth chiefly to constraints imposed by the state-led macro-political environment. However, this article finds that enterprise unions, the primary form in Korea, not only pursued weak to moderate economic unionism, but also recorded a gradual pattern of growth while exhibiting significant diversity like a stable, monopolistic, white-collar enterprise unionism model in the public sector and a precarious blue-collar model within manufacturing industries during that period. That diverse pattern of union growth was repeated and intensified by the explosive growth of enterprise unions following the stable blue-collar model in chaebol large-sized metalworking enterprises, the temporarily thriving blue-collar model in small- and medium-sized metalworking enterprises, and the vigorous but various white-collar model in service industries during the period of political democratization (1987-94). In particular, Korean union growth was not always solely, decisively, and negatively influenced by the state, as presumed in much of the literature. Instead, like their counterparts in several advanced nations, the dissimilar organizational structures and bargaining power of the five enterprise unionism models could be analyzed by several industry- and firm-specific factors, such as growth stages, degree of state regulation, firm size, and economic and social statuses of workers in their respective firms' internal and external labor markets.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Political Science & Economics > Department of Economics > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE