Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

에너지 플러스의 시뮬레이션 결과와 실제 냉방에너지 사용량의 비교 분석 및 GHP와 EHP의 에너지 성능비교에 관한 연구Comparison of Actual Cooling Energy Consumption with Calculated Cooling Energy Consumption and Analysis of Energy Performance between GHP and EHP

Other Titles
Comparison of Actual Cooling Energy Consumption with Calculated Cooling Energy Consumption and Analysis of Energy Performance between GHP and EHP
Authors
김동균전종욱김강수
Issue Date
2011
Publisher
대한건축학회
Keywords
에너지 플러스; 가스히트펌프; 전기히트펌프; 1차 에너지 사용량; 2차 에너지 사용량; EnergyPlus; Gas Engine Driven Heat Pump; Electric Heat Pump; Primary Energy; Secondary Energy
Citation
대한건축학회논문집, v.27, no.05, pp.237 - 244
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
대한건축학회논문집
Volume
27
Number
05
Start Page
237
End Page
244
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/113455
ISSN
2733-6239
Abstract
This paper is focused on the energy performance evaluation of Gas Engine Driven Heat Pump (GHP) and Electric Heat Pump (EHP) in accordance with the conversion factors for primary energy and secondary energy. Generally, primary energy of gas consumption is lower than that of electric consumption due to different conversion factors. For this study, we measured actual energy consumption for a target building in which GHP was installed with outdoor unit as HVAC system. The measured data was compared with simulated results from EnergyPlus developed by Department of Energy in USA. As a verifying results, the mean bias error and the root mean squared error of gas consumption were -0.19% and 10.5%,respectively. When we applied electric charge for general building, the cooling operating cost of the EHP was more expensive than that of the GHP in the building. However, operating cost of EHP showed lower than operating cost of GHP when we applied electric charge for the educational building due to reduced charge in accordance of building purpose. Even though the primary energy use of EHP was more used than that of GHP by 27.2%, secondary energy of GHP was higher than that of EHP by 42.6%, because the EHP has high-performance of COP 3.59 compared with the GHP performance of COP 1.13. Therefore, it is desirable to use gas for cooling energy of in a target building for primary energy.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Engineering > Department of Architecture > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE