선하증권상 FIO 특약의 개념과 효력 - 대법원 2010.4.15.선고 2007다50649판결을 중심으로-A Study on the meaning and validity of FIO clause in the Bill of Lading
- Other Titles
- A Study on the meaning and validity of FIO clause in the Bill of Lading
- Authors
- 김인현; 박영준
- Issue Date
- 2011
- Publisher
- 한국상사판례학회
- Keywords
- FIO(Free In and Out); Voyage Charter party; Ocean Carrier; Gencon; Obligatory Provision.; 용선자 선적․하역 담당조건; 항해용선계약; 해상운송인; 젠콘(Gencon); 강행규정
- Citation
- 상사판례연구, v.24, no.3, pp.249 - 280
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 상사판례연구
- Volume
- 24
- Number
- 3
- Start Page
- 249
- End Page
- 280
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/113547
- ISSN
- 1225-0392
- Abstract
- FIO terms are widely used in the voyage charter parties in Korean practices. Under the FIO terms, several issues are raised. The first issue is whether the shipowner's liability to load and discharge is shifted to the charterer or not. In the Korean Supreme Court case 2010.4.15. Docket No. 2007da50649, the Court accepted that the liability of the carrier (shipowner) to load, stow and discharge is shifted to the charterer. The second issue is whether the FIO terms is null and void because it makes the carrier less liable than the Korean Commercial Code Art. 795 and thus it is against the obligatory provision of Art. 799, which is equivalent to Hague-Visby Rules Art. 3(8). In the above case, the Court rendered that it was not against Art. 799.
The authors address legal issues of FIO term and analyse the judgment of the above Korean Supreme Court on the meaning of FIO term and submit a proposal for improving the legal status of the FIO term in the Korean Commercial Code.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - Graduate School > School of Law > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.