Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The Effect of Adhesion Barriers in Preventing Pericardial Adhesion Depending on the Type of Barrier: Solution Type versus Film TypeThe Effect of Adhesion Barriers in Preventing Pericardial Adhesion Depending on the Type of Barrier: Solution Type versus Film Type

Other Titles
The Effect of Adhesion Barriers in Preventing Pericardial Adhesion Depending on the Type of Barrier: Solution Type versus Film Type
Authors
Kuk Hui Son노인섭Jae-Kyung Won손호성
Issue Date
2011
Publisher
한국생체재료학회
Keywords
pericardium; animal model; biomaterials
Citation
생체재료학회지, v.15, no.1, pp.22 - 27
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
생체재료학회지
Volume
15
Number
1
Start Page
22
End Page
27
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/114011
ISSN
1226-4601
Abstract
Background: Pericardial adhesion is a significant challenge for re-sternotomy. An adhesion barrier made with hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose (HA-CMC) has been used. The solution type and film type of HA-CMC barrier was commercially introduced. While the solution type is easy to apply but possible to stream down the wound sites, the film type showed fixation on the wound sites but difficulty in handling. This study was designed to investigate the effect of adhesion barriers according to the type of barriers Methods: Twelve mongrel dogs were classified into two group; the S group (n=6) which received the solution type of barrier, and the F group (n=6) which was received the film type. After making an abrasion wound on left ventricular wall, the wound was covered with a solution or film type of barrier. After 4 weeks, adhesion severity (Grade 0-5) and adhesion strength (grade 0-4) were measured. The number of white blood cells (WBC), rate of erythrocyte sedimentation (ESR), and the amount of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured for the estimation of systemic inflammation at 1 week and 4 weeks postoperatively. Microscopic examination was also performed. Results: Adhesion severities of the S and F groups were both scored as 4. The adhesion strengths of the S group and F group were 4 and 3, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups when WBC count, CRP, and ESR were compared. Degrees of fibrosis, regeneration of the mesothelial cell, inflammation, and foreign body reaction were not also significantly different between the groups. Conclusion: Although the concern that solution type of barrier might be decreased the anti-adhesion effect because of the possibility of streaming down the wound sites, the anti-adhesion effect was not significantly different between groups. These results may help surgeons decide the appropriate type of adhesion barrier to use.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE