Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

APPLICATION OF A NOVEL DOSE-UNCERTAINTY MODEL FOR DOSE-UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN PROSTATE INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY

Authors
Jin, HosangPalta, Jatinder R.Kim, You-HyunKim, Siyong
Issue Date
1-11월-2010
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Keywords
Dose uncertainty; dose-uncertainty model; prostate IMRT; intrafraction motion; interfraction motion
Citation
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, v.78, no.3, pp.920 - 928
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Volume
78
Number
3
Start Page
920
End Page
928
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/115351
DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.063
ISSN
0360-3016
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze dose uncertainty using a previously published dose-uncertainty model, and to assess potential dosimetric risks existing in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods and Materials: The dose-uncertainty model provides a three-dimensional (3D) dose-uncertainty distribution in a given confidence level. For 8 retrospectively selected patients, dose-uncertainty maps were constructed using the dose-uncertainty model at the 95% CL. In addition to uncertainties inherent to the radiation treatment planning system, four scenarios of spatial errors were considered: machine only (S1), S1 + intrafraction, S1 + interfraction, and S1 + both intrafraction and interfraction errors. To evaluate the potential risks of the IMRT plans, three dose-uncertainty based plan evaluation tools were introduced: confidence-weighted dose volume histogram, confidence-weighted dose distribution, and dose-uncertainty volume histogram. Results: Dose uncertainty caused by interfraction setup error was more significant than that of intrafraction motion error. The maximum dose uncertainty (95% confidence) of the clinical target volume (CTV) was smaller than 5% of the prescribed dose in all but two cases (13.9% and 10.2%). The dose uncertainty for 95% of the CTV volume ranged from 1.3% to 2.9% of the prescribed dose. Conclusions: The dose uncertainty in prostate IMRT could be evaluated using the dose-uncertainty model. Prostate IMRT plans satisfying the same plan objectives could generate a significantly different dose uncertainty because a complex interplay of many uncertainty sources. The uncertainty-based plan evaluation contributes to generating reliable and error-resistant treatment plans. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Health Sciences > Department of Radiologic Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE