APPLICATION OF A NOVEL DOSE-UNCERTAINTY MODEL FOR DOSE-UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN PROSTATE INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY
- Authors
- Jin, Hosang; Palta, Jatinder R.; Kim, You-Hyun; Kim, Siyong
- Issue Date
- 1-11월-2010
- Publisher
- ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
- Keywords
- Dose uncertainty; dose-uncertainty model; prostate IMRT; intrafraction motion; interfraction motion
- Citation
- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, v.78, no.3, pp.920 - 928
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
- Volume
- 78
- Number
- 3
- Start Page
- 920
- End Page
- 928
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/115351
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.063
- ISSN
- 0360-3016
- Abstract
- Purpose: To analyze dose uncertainty using a previously published dose-uncertainty model, and to assess potential dosimetric risks existing in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods and Materials: The dose-uncertainty model provides a three-dimensional (3D) dose-uncertainty distribution in a given confidence level. For 8 retrospectively selected patients, dose-uncertainty maps were constructed using the dose-uncertainty model at the 95% CL. In addition to uncertainties inherent to the radiation treatment planning system, four scenarios of spatial errors were considered: machine only (S1), S1 + intrafraction, S1 + interfraction, and S1 + both intrafraction and interfraction errors. To evaluate the potential risks of the IMRT plans, three dose-uncertainty based plan evaluation tools were introduced: confidence-weighted dose volume histogram, confidence-weighted dose distribution, and dose-uncertainty volume histogram. Results: Dose uncertainty caused by interfraction setup error was more significant than that of intrafraction motion error. The maximum dose uncertainty (95% confidence) of the clinical target volume (CTV) was smaller than 5% of the prescribed dose in all but two cases (13.9% and 10.2%). The dose uncertainty for 95% of the CTV volume ranged from 1.3% to 2.9% of the prescribed dose. Conclusions: The dose uncertainty in prostate IMRT could be evaluated using the dose-uncertainty model. Prostate IMRT plans satisfying the same plan objectives could generate a significantly different dose uncertainty because a complex interplay of many uncertainty sources. The uncertainty-based plan evaluation contributes to generating reliable and error-resistant treatment plans. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Health Sciences > Department of Radiologic Science > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.