Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of Postmortem Meat Quality and Consumer Sensory Characteristic Evaluations, According to Porcine Quality Classification

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorNam, Yun-Ju-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Young-Min-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Da-Woon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Byoung-Chul-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T18:47:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-08T18:47:45Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-10-
dc.date.issued2009-04-
dc.identifier.issn1226-7708-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/120397-
dc.description.abstractThis study examined variations in postmortem meat quality characteristics and consumer sensory evaluations of different pork quality classes in fresh and cooked meat. Pale, soft, and exudative (PSE) meat had the highest drip loss, lightness, and the lowest PH24 hr whereas dark, firm, and dry (DFD) meat showed the opposite results. When the fresh Meat was evaluated by consumer panelists, they could only distinguish the PSE class of meat and it scored lowest in over-all acceptability. However, the panelists did not consider cooked PSE or DFD pork to be unacceptable overall, indicating that consumers cannot distinguish the quality of cooked pork.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherKOREAN SOCIETY FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-KOSFOST-
dc.subjectLONGISSIMUS-DORSI MUSCLE-
dc.subjectPORK QUALITY-
dc.subjectINSTRUMENTAL TENDERNESS-
dc.subjectEXUDATIVE CONDITION-
dc.subjectGLYCOLYTIC RATE-
dc.subjectCOLOR-
dc.subjectLOIN-
dc.subjectPSE-
dc.subjectPALATABILITY-
dc.subjectTRAITS-
dc.titleComparison of Postmortem Meat Quality and Consumer Sensory Characteristic Evaluations, According to Porcine Quality Classification-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Young-Min-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Byoung-Chul-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-77956508787-
dc.identifier.wosid000265748900004-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationFOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, v.18, no.2, pp.307 - 311-
dc.relation.isPartOfFOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY-
dc.citation.titleFOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY-
dc.citation.volume18-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage307-
dc.citation.endPage311-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART001338670-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaFood Science & Technology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryFood Science & Technology-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLONGISSIMUS-DORSI MUSCLE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPORK QUALITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINSTRUMENTAL TENDERNESS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEXUDATIVE CONDITION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGLYCOLYTIC RATE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOLOR-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLOIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPSE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPALATABILITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRAITS-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpork quality class-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpostmortem meat quality-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorconsumer sensory evaluation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpig-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology > Division of Food Bioscience and Technology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE