Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Different parts of erector spinae muscle fatigability in subjects with and without low back pain

Authors
Sung, Paul S.Lammers, Andrew R.Danial, Pamela
Issue Date
Feb-2009
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Keywords
Electromyography; Low back pain; Muscle fatigue; Erector spinae muscles; Median frequency
Citation
SPINE JOURNAL, v.9, no.2, pp 115 - 120
Pages
6
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
SPINE JOURNAL
Volume
9
Number
2
Start Page
115
End Page
120
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/120711
DOI
10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.011
ISSN
1529-9430
1878-1632
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There is conflicting evidence regarding erector spinae muscle fatigability because previous studies have not considered the thoracic and lumbar components separately. These muscles have very different mechanical responses and, therefore, would be recruited differentially for the chosen task. PURPOSE: The present study was conducted to compare whether fatigability differences exist in the thoracic and lumbar parts of the erector spinae muscles in subjects with and without low back pain (LBP). STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Motion Analysis Lab at Cleveland State University. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study sample included 40 subjects with LBP and 40 subjects without LBP. OUTCOME MEASURES: The fatigability of the erector spinae muscles was compared based oil median frequency of electromyography (EMG) versus time. The level of pain of each subject was also compared using the Oswestry Disability Index. METHODS: Fatigue measurements were evaluated between groups based on the assessed sides as well as the thoracic and lumbar parts of the erector spinae muscles using surface EMG. A modified version of the isometric fatigue test as introduced by Sorensen was used to test the endurance of the erector spinae muscles. RESULTS: There were significant median EMG frequency (F((1.78))= 28.82, p=.001) differences in the thoracic and lumbar parts of the erector spinae muscles between subjects with and without LBP. The thoracic part had a significantly lower median EMG frequency than the lumbar part in subjects with LBP. The thoracic and lumbar parts of the erector spinae muscles had interactions with group (F((1.78))=47.88, p=.01) and age (F((1. 78))= 16.5 1, p=.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggested that subjects with LBP demonstrated higher fatigability of the erector spinae muscles at the thoracic part than at the lumbar part. The increased fatigability of the thoracic part needs to be emphasized in rehabilitation strategies for subjects with LBP. In addition, as age increased, the median frequency of the lumbar part of the erector spinae muscles significantly decreased. Understanding the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of the erector spinae muscle may enhance clinical outcomes and rehabilitation strategies for subjects, with LBP. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Health Sciences > Department of Physical Therapy > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE