Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

소조사면 선량 계측을 위한 엣지검출기의 특성 분석Dosimetric Characteristics of Edge Detector™ in Small Beam Dosimetry

Other Titles
Dosimetric Characteristics of Edge Detector™ in Small Beam Dosimetry
Authors
장경환이보람김유현최경식박병문이정석배용기홍세미이정우
Issue Date
2009
Publisher
한국의학물리학회
Keywords
엣지검출기; 소조사면; 반음영; Edge detector; Small beam; Penumbra
Citation
의학물리, v.20, no.4, pp.191 - 198
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
의학물리
Volume
20
Number
4
Start Page
191
End Page
198
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/121264
ISSN
2508-4445
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated an edge detector for small-beam dosimetry. We measured the dose linearity, dose rate dependence, output factor, beam profiles, and percentage depth dose using an edge detector (Model 1118 Edge) for 6-MV photon beams at different field sizes and depths. The obtained values were compared with those obtained using a standard volume ionization chamber (CC13) and photon diode detector (PFD). The dose linearity results for the three detectors showed good agreement within 1%. The edge detector had the best linearity of ±0.08%. The edge detector and PFD showed little dose rate dependency throughout the range of 100∼600 MU/min, while CC13 showed a significant discrepancy of approximately −5% at 100 MU/min. The output factors of the three detectors showed good agreement within 1% for the tested field sizes. However, the output factor of CC13 compared to the other two detectors had a maximum difference of 21% for small field sizes (∼4×4 cm²). When analyzing the 20∼80% penumbra, the penumbra measured using CC13 was approximately two times wider than that using the edge detector for all field sizes. The width measured using PFD was approximately 30% wider for all field sizes. Compared to the edge detector, the 10∼90% penumbras measured using the CC13 and PFD were approximately 55% and 19% wider, respectively. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the edge detector was close to the real field size, while the other two detectors measured values that were 8∼10% greater for all field sizes. Percentage depth doses measured by the three detectors corresponded to each other for small beams. Based on the results, we consider the edge detector as an appropriate small-beam detector, while CC13 and PFD can lead to some errors when used for small beam fields under 4×4 cm².
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Health Sciences > Department of Radiologic Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE