소조사면 선량 계측을 위한 엣지검출기의 특성 분석Dosimetric Characteristics of Edge Detector™ in Small Beam Dosimetry
- Other Titles
- Dosimetric Characteristics of Edge Detector™ in Small Beam Dosimetry
- Authors
- 장경환; 이보람; 김유현; 최경식; 박병문; 이정석; 배용기; 홍세미; 이정우
- Issue Date
- 2009
- Publisher
- 한국의학물리학회
- Keywords
- 엣지검출기; 소조사면; 반음영; Edge detector; Small beam; Penumbra
- Citation
- 의학물리, v.20, no.4, pp.191 - 198
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 의학물리
- Volume
- 20
- Number
- 4
- Start Page
- 191
- End Page
- 198
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/121264
- ISSN
- 2508-4445
- Abstract
- In this study, we evaluated an edge detector for small-beam dosimetry. We measured the dose linearity, dose
rate dependence, output factor, beam profiles, and percentage depth dose using an edge detector (Model 1118
Edge) for 6-MV photon beams at different field sizes and depths. The obtained values were compared with those
obtained using a standard volume ionization chamber (CC13) and photon diode detector (PFD). The dose linearity
results for the three detectors showed good agreement within 1%. The edge detector had the best linearity of
±0.08%. The edge detector and PFD showed little dose rate dependency throughout the range of 100∼600
MU/min, while CC13 showed a significant discrepancy of approximately −5% at 100 MU/min. The output factors
of the three detectors showed good agreement within 1% for the tested field sizes. However, the output factor
of CC13 compared to the other two detectors had a maximum difference of 21% for small field sizes (∼4×4
cm²). When analyzing the 20∼80% penumbra, the penumbra measured using CC13 was approximately two times
wider than that using the edge detector for all field sizes. The width measured using PFD was approximately
30% wider for all field sizes. Compared to the edge detector, the 10∼90% penumbras measured using the CC13
and PFD were approximately 55% and 19% wider, respectively. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the
edge detector was close to the real field size, while the other two detectors measured values that were 8∼10%
greater for all field sizes. Percentage depth doses measured by the three detectors corresponded to each other
for small beams. Based on the results, we consider the edge detector as an appropriate small-beam detector,
while CC13 and PFD can lead to some errors when used for small beam fields under 4×4 cm².
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Health Sciences > Department of Radiologic Science > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.