Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

전립선비대증에 대한 경요도 전립선 절제술과 경요도 레이저 전립선기화술의 비교A Comparison of Outcomes between Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and High Power Potassium-titanyl-phosphate Laser Vaporization of the Prostate

Other Titles
A Comparison of Outcomes between Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and High Power Potassium-titanyl-phosphate Laser Vaporization of the Prostate
Authors
강승철박세홍윤덕기문두건함병국고기원
Issue Date
2009
Publisher
대한남성과학회
Keywords
Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Complication; Potassium titanyl phosphate laser; Transurethral resection of prostate; Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Complication; Potassium titanyl phosphate laser; Transurethral resection of prostate
Citation
The World Journal of Men's Health, v.27, no.1, pp.42 - 48
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
The World Journal of Men's Health
Volume
27
Number
1
Start Page
42
End Page
48
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/122042
ISSN
2287-4208
Abstract
Purpose: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard for the surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but the procedure’s limitations are its invasiveness and the high prevalence of complications. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using an 80w high power potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser has recently been developed as a less invasive treatment. We assessed the efficacy of PVP as an alternative to TURP for the treatment of BPH. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 324 patients who were surgically treated for BPH from July 2005 to December 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 324 patients, 190 patients of Group I were treated by TURP and 134 patients of Group II were treated by PVP. Before treatment, assessing the serum PSA level transrectal ultrasound and urodynamic study were done. The primary efficacy parameters were the postoperative international prostatic symptom score and the uroflow parametersat 6 months after the operation. The secondary efficacy parameters were perioperative factors such as the duration of the hospital stay, the operative time and the catheter-indwelling period. Any adverse reactions were monitored. Results: There was no significant difference in the basal characteristics of the study subjects between both the groups. The primary efficacy parameters, the IPSS, the Qmax and thepostvoid residual urine volume were significantly improved in both groups, but there were no significant differences between both the groups. In group II, the perioperative parameters such as the operation time, the hospitalization day and the catheter-indwelling periodwere significantly shorter than those of group I (p<0.05). But the urethral complications such as urethral stricture, dysuria and bladder neck contracture were more common in group II. Conclusions: These results suggest that PVP using an 80w high power KTP could be an alternative for TURP in terms of efficacy. For the general, safe use of PVP, PVP should be carefully done until the causes of the urethral complications of PVP are determined.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Moon, Du Geon photo

Moon, Du Geon
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE