Systemic methylprednisolone for hearing preservation during cochlear implant surgery: A double blinded placebo-controlled trial
- Authors
- O'Leary, Stephen J.; Choi, June; Brady, Karina; Matthews, Sheila; Ozdowska, Katie Boncza; Payne, Matthew; McLean, Tim; Rousset, Alex; Lo, Jonathon; Creber, Nathan; Tari, Sylvia; Dowell, Richard; Briggs, Robert
- Issue Date
- 5월-2021
- Publisher
- ELSEVIER
- Keywords
- Cochlear implantation; Hearing preservation; Methylprednisolone; Steroids; Impedance; Speech perception
- Citation
- HEARING RESEARCH, v.404
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- HEARING RESEARCH
- Volume
- 404
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/128098
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108224
- ISSN
- 0378-5955
- Abstract
- Aim: To assess whether a single, peri-operative, high dose of methylprednisolone can improve the preser-vation of residual acoustic hearing following cochlear implantation (CI). Methods: This was a double blinded placebo-controlled trial, performed in a tertiary academic centre. The hypothesis was that methylprednisolone would improve the preservation of hearing, and lower elec-trode impedances. Adult patients (18-85 years) with hearing at 85 dB or better at 500 Hz in the ear to be implanted were randomly allocated to either treatment (methylprednisolone, 1g administered in-travenously upon induction of anaesthesia) or control (normal saline infusion). As per standard clinical practice, all patients received a routine dose of dexamethasone (8 mg intravenously) on induction of anaesthesia. Implantation was undertaken with a slim and flexible lateral wall electrode via the round window. Surgical technique was routine, with adherence to soft surgical principles. The primary outcome was hearing preservation within 20 dB at 500 Hz, 12 months following cochlear implantation. Secondary outcomes included hearing preservation at 6 weeks and 3 months, monopolar electrode impedance, and Consonant-Vowel-Consonant (CVC) Phoneme scores at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled into the control group and 48 patients received the steroid. The number of patients achieving hearing preservation at 12 months did not differ significantly between those receiving methylprednisolone treatment and the controls. There were no differences in hearing preservation at any frequency at either 6 weeks or 3 months after implantation. Neither CVC phoneme scores nor electrode impedances differed between the groups. Conclusions: This paper demonstrates that high-dose local steroid injection at surgery was not effective in preventing a loss of residual hearing, improving speech perception, or lowering electrode impedances. The findings were contrary to the experimental literature, and emerging clinical evidence that steroid elution from implant electrodes influences cochlear biology in humans. We found no evidence to support the widely-held practice of administering intravenous steroids in the perioperative period, in an attempt to preserve residual hearing. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.