Developing spatial agricultural drought risk index with controllable geo-spatial indicators: A case study for South Korea and Kazakhstan
- Authors
- Kim, S.J.; Park, S.; Lee, S.J.; Shaimerdenova, A.; Kim, J.; Park, E.; Lee, W.; Kim, G.S.; Kim, N.; Kim, T.H.; Lim, C.-H.; Choi, Y.; Lee, W.-K.
- Issue Date
- 15-2월-2021
- Publisher
- Elsevier Ltd
- Keywords
- Adaptive capacity; Agricultural drought risk index; Disaster; Risk; Sensitivity; Vulnerability
- Citation
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, v.54
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Volume
- 54
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/129204
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102056
- ISSN
- 2212-4209
- Abstract
- Constant environmental degradation and increased frequency and severity of natural disasters have been evident over the past few decades worldwide. As such, scientific tools to predict and assess risks keep being developed. Assessing disaster risk is an important task in supporting the transition to a sustainable society. However, as disasters and systems become more complex, disaster models combining diverse aspects including climatic, social, economic, and environmental factors are necessary. For this study, we set a model using the concept of risk by identifying hazards, exposure, and vulnerability. Here, the vulnerability was classified into two domains, sensitivity and adaptive capacity, and two spheres, natural/built environment and human environment. Also, we stressed that controllable geo-spatial indicators should be included in risk assessments to effectively reduce risk and implement adequate spatio-temporal actions. The approach of this study was applied to Kazakhstan and South Korea as a pilot study to develop Agricultural Drought Risk Index (ADRI) and maps. As a result, the agricultural drought risk could be analyzed for South Korea and Kazakhstan. In addition, we performed additional spatial analyses at a reasonable scale for practical use. It was concluded that prioritizing risk areas at administrative and site level could contribute in decision and policy-making for risk reduction. Furthermore, spatial data availability and quality were found to be significant in assessing disaster risk. © 2021 The Authors
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology > Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.