Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Optimizing extraction procedures for better removal of potentially toxic elements during EDTA-assisted soil washing

Authors
Sun, TaoBeiyuan, JingziGielen, GertyMao, XialiSong, ZhaoliangXu, SongOk, Yong SikRinklebe, JorgLiu, DanHou, DeyiWong, Jonathan W. C.Wang, Hailong
Issue Date
9월-2020
Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
Keywords
Static equilibrium extraction; Ultrasound-assisted extraction; Soil washing; Heavy metal; Chelant
Citation
JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, v.20, no.9, pp.3417 - 3426
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
Volume
20
Number
9
Start Page
3417
End Page
3426
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/130489
DOI
10.1007/s11368-020-02678-0
ISSN
1439-0108
Abstract
Purpose Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-enhanced soil washing is an important technique of removing potentially toxic elements (PTEs) from contaminated soils. Conventional mechanical shaking (CMS) method is widely adopted in soil washing. However, it consumes a considerable amount of time and energy. Extraction methods which need less contact time or power, such as static equilibrium extraction (SEE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), are potential to replace CMS in industrial application. Methods The washing process of the soil from a contaminated site was optimized by investigating various extraction conditions, including EDTA concentration, contact time, and different extraction methods, such as CMS, SEE, and UAE, in this study. Results The results indicated that EDTA greatly enhanced the removal of cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) from the soil. The EDTA was more effective in removing Pb and Cu than Cd and Zn, regardless of the extraction method. This might be mainly attributed to the strong complexation capacity of EDTA with Pb and Cu and geochemical distribution of the target PTEs. The three extraction methods were almost equally efficient, while SEE required less energy and UAE needed shortened contact time compared with CMS. Conclusion Based on the above results, SEE and UAE are promising alternatives to CMS for cleaning up PTEs-contaminated soils.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology > Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE