객관적 지표(Objective Indicia)에 기한 발명의 진보성 판단론Inventive step decision through Objective Indicia
- Other Titles
- Inventive step decision through Objective Indicia
- Authors
- 조영선
- Issue Date
- 2010
- Publisher
- 안암법학회
- Keywords
- Objective indicia; Secondary consideration; nonobviousness; Hind sight; commercial success; long-felt need; license; copying; failure of others; simultaneous invention; Timing approach; cost benefit approach; Objective indicia; Secondary consideration; nonobviousness; Hind sight; commercial success; long-felt need; license; copying; failure of others; simultaneous invention; Timing approach; cost benefit approach; 객관적 지표; 2차적 고려사항; 진보성; 사후적 고찰; 상업적 성공; 오랜 기간의 필요; 실시권 설정; 모방; 타인의 실패; 동시에 이루어진 발명; 시기론; 비용 이익 접근법
- Citation
- 안암법학, no.33, pp.395 - 430
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 안암법학
- Number
- 33
- Start Page
- 395
- End Page
- 430
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/134587
- ISSN
- 1226-6159
- Abstract
- It is integral to avoid the subjective and hindsight bias in determining inventive step. For this goal, Europe and the U.S. have had various lists of objective indications to imply inventive step of inventions. After KSR (2007) decision, the importance of secondary factors are being revisited and emphasized further in the U.S. to substitute the old anti-hindsight bias resolutions: TSM test. In addition, some recent studies propose new objective indicia to decide the Non-obviousness. Among them are the theory of ‘Timing approach' and ‘Cost-Benefit approach'. Some scholars contend that the court could reshape patent system for industry specific manner using Non-obviousness determination as policy leverage. In Europe, generally objective indicia are qualified equal with technical evaluation in inventive step decision. On the other hand, in Korea, the consideration of secondary factors takes very feeble portion in inventive step determination and is even being ignored in practice, which is far from reasonability. Referring to the lessons of American and European experiences and updated studies, it is desirable for Korean courts to give much more stress upon the objective indicia in inventive step determination than the present.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - ETC > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/134587)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.