Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

외국인 보호 및 강제퇴거절차와 구제절차에 대한 공법적 고찰A Public Law Analysis of Alien Protection, Expulsion and Remedial Measures

Other Titles
A Public Law Analysis of Alien Protection, Expulsion and Remedial Measures
Authors
하명호
Issue Date
2009
Publisher
고려대학교 법학연구원
Keywords
alien; investigation of infringement; protection order; expulsion; immigration; due process; warrant requirement; habeas corpus claims; 외국인; 위반조사; 보호명령; 강제퇴거; 출입국관리; 적법절차; 영장주의; 구속적부심청구권
Citation
고려법학, no.52, pp.167 - 212
Indexed
KCI
OTHER
Journal Title
고려법학
Number
52
Start Page
167
End Page
212
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/134792
ISSN
1598-1584
Abstract
With the increase of alien activities within Korea, the matters of alien protection and expulsion have become a social problem. Expulsion, as stipulated in the Immigration Control Act, is a serious restriction that deprives the livlihood of those aliens who have entered the country voluntarily. Due to the extraordinary nature of aliens and the fact that gaining access to remedial measures is virtually impossible, no one with the exception of a few civic groups, have raised the issue at all. The purpose of this work is to examine from a public law perspective the procedural aspects of the Immigration Control Act concerning expulsion. In this regard, it is critical to study the implications of Article 12 of the Constitution which protects personal freedom. Generally, the warrant requirement of the Korean Constitution only applies to investigation procedures. Therefore arrest, detention, seizure and search in the process of expulsion are not considered to be unconstitutional, even if they are carried out without a court-issued warrant. However this does not mean that due process of law can be disregarded. In order for the expulsion procedure to become a substantive hearing, legislative changes should be introduced, including the separation of investigation procedures from legal proceedings, as well as the granting of neutral and independent powers to the judicial institution responsible for such cases. Although the Constitution is read as not applying the warrant requirement in administrative procedures, paragraph 6 of Article 12 plays a complementary role by guaranteeing post hoc judicial remedies for arrest cases. The legal concretization of such an approach outside the realm of criminal procedural law is the Habeas Corpus Act. Unfortunately the provisory clause of Article 2 of the Habeas Corpus Act excludes the most vital remedy for personal freedom with regard to those protected by the Immigration Control Act. This is a flagrant violation of the Constitution and therefore necessitates an amendment.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Ha, Myeong Ho photo

Ha, Myeong Ho
법학전문대학원
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE