Preferences for life-sustaining treatment in Korean adults: a cross-sectional study
- Authors
- Youn, HyunChul; Lee, Suk-young; Jung, Han-yong; Kim, Shin-Gyeom; Kim, Seung-Hyun; Jeong, Hyun-Ghang
- Issue Date
- 2021
- Publisher
- BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
- Keywords
- adult palliative care; adult psychiatry; health policy; mental health; public health
- Citation
- BMJ OPEN, v.11, no.1
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- BMJ OPEN
- Volume
- 11
- Number
- 1
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/138461
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039470
- ISSN
- 2044-6055
- Abstract
- Objectives Life-sustaining treatment is any treatment that serves to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical conditions, and includes cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, haemodialysis and left ventricular assist devices. This study aimed to investigate the thoughts on life-sustaining treatment of Koreans and to assess the factors associated with deciding to not receive life-sustaining treatment if they develop a terminal disease. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Guro-gu centre for dementia from 1 May 2018 to 31 December 2019. Participants In total, 150 individuals participated in this study. Outcome measures The questionnaire consisted of self-report items with some instructions, demographic characteristics, thoughts on life-sustaining treatment and psychosocial scales. The preferences of the participants were investigated on the assumption that they develop terminal cancer. The psychosocial scales included the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Results We classified our participants into two groups: individuals who wanted to receive life-sustaining treatment (IRLT) and individuals who wanted to not receive life-sustaining treatment (INLT). There were twice as many participants in the INLT group than there were in the IRLT. In making this decision, the INLT group focused more on physical and mental distress. Additionally, 32.7% of participants responded that terminal status was an optimal time for this decision, but more participants want to decide it earlier. The GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were significantly higher in the INLT group than in the IRLT group. However, the INLT group had significantly lower MSPSS family scores. Conclusion Our findings can help assess issues regarding advance directives and life-sustaining treatment, and will be a reference for designing future studies on this issue.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.