Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Continuous Gait Phase Estimation Using LSTM for Robotic Transfemoral Prosthesis Across Walking Speeds

Authors
Lee, JinwonHong, WoolimHur, Pilwon
Issue Date
2021
Publisher
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
Keywords
Legged locomotion; Prosthetics; Thigh; Phase estimation; Estimation; Force sensors; Exoskeletons; Transfemoral prosthesis; gait phase estimation; machine learning
Citation
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, v.29, pp.1470 - 1477
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING
Volume
29
Start Page
1470
End Page
1477
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/138779
DOI
10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3098689
ISSN
1534-4320
Abstract
User gait phase estimation plays a key role for the seamless control of the lower-limb robotic assistive devices (e.g., exoskeletons or prostheses) during ambulation. To achieve this, several studies have attempted to estimate the gait phase using a thigh or shank angle. However, their estimation resulted in some deviation from the actual walking and varied across the walking speeds. In this study, we investigated the different setups using for the machine learning approach to obtain more accurate and consistent gait phase estimation for the robotic transfemoral prosthesis over different walking speeds. Considering the transfemoral prosthetic application, we proposed two different sensor setups: i) the angular positions and velocities of both thigh and torso (S1) and ii) the angular positions and velocities of both thigh and torso, and heel force data (S2). The proposed setups and method are experimentally evaluated with three healthy young subjects at four different walking speeds: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 m/s. Both results showed robust and accurate gait phase estimation with respect to the ground truth (loss value of S1: 4.54e-03 Vs. S2: 4.70e-03). S1 had the advantage of a simple equipment setup using only two IMUs, while S2 had the advantage of estimating more accurate heel-strikes than S1 by using additional heel force data. The choice between the two sensor setups can depend on the researchers' preference in consideration of the device setup or the focus of the interest.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE