Contrasting Catalytic Functions of Metal Vanadates and Their Oxide Composite Analogues for NH3-Assisted, Selective NOX Transformation

Abstract

V2O5 fuses with transition metals to create dozens of different metal vanadates, whose acidic/redox traits can be diverse yet optimized for selective catalytic NOX reduction (SCR) by changing the metals used or their metal:vanadium stoichiometry. However, no metal vanadate has been compared with its metal oxide composite analogue as an active phase for SCR, albeit a vanadate occasionally outperforms an oxide composite simulating a commercial catalyst (V2O5-WO3). Herein, Cu3V2O8 and CuO-VO2/V2O5 were rationally selected as model phases of metal vanadates and oxide composites and isolated using pH regulation of their synthetic mixture to <=similar to 5 (pH1/pH5) and similar to 11 (pH11), respectively. The pH1/pH5/pH11 samples were comparable with regard to morphological, textural, and compositional traits but not for crystallographic features. This thus provided the impetus to simulate the pH1/pH5/pH11 surfaces under a SO2-containing feed-gas stream, by which SOA2-/ HSOA- functionalities (A = 3-4) were anchored on their (defective) Lewis acidic metals and/or labile oxygens (O-alpha). This could result in the formation of pH1-S/pH5-S/pH11-S, whose major surface species were Bronsted acidic bonds (SOA2-/ HSOA-) and redox sites (O-alpha; mobile oxygen (O-M); oxygen vacancy (O-V)). pH1-S/pH5-S/pH11-S were similar in terms of NH3 binding energies and energy barriers in SCR yet escalated collision frequencies among the surface species involved in the sequence of pH11-S < pH5-S < pH1-S (via kinetic assessments), as was the case with the numbers of SOA(2)(-)/HSOA- functionalities of the catalysts (via temperature-resolved Raman spectroscopy). These were coupled to elevate the efficiency of acidic cycling on the order of pH11-S < pH5-S < pH1-S. Meanwhile, the amounts of O-alpha and O-V (or O-M) innate to pH1-S/pH5-S were smaller than and comparable to those of pH11-S, respectively. Nonetheless, pH1-S/pH5-S provided greater O-M mobility than pH11-S, thereby proceeding better with redox cycling than pH11-S (via O-18-labeling O-2-on/off runs). Furthermore, pH1-S/pH5-S outperformed pH11-S in SCR under diffusion-limited domains, while enhancing the resistance to H2O, ammonium (bi)sulfate poisons, or hydrothermal aging over pH11-S by diversifying the selective N-2 production pathway other than SCR.