Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Cilostazol versus aspirin in ischemic stroke with cerebral microbleeds versus prior intracerebral hemorrhage

Authors
Park, Hong-KyunLee, Ji SungKim, Bum JoonPark, Jong-HoKim, Yong-JaeYu, SungwookHwang, Yang-HaRha, Joung-HoHeo, Sung HyukAhn, Seong HwanSeo, Woo-KeunPark, Jong-MooLee, Ju-HunKwon, Jee-HyunSohn, Sung-IlJung, Jin-ManKwon, Sun U.Hong, Keun-Sik
Issue Date
2021
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Keywords
Cilostazol; aspirin; cerebral microbleed; intracerebral hemorrhage; ischemic stroke
Citation
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, v.16, no.9, pp.1019 - 1030
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE
Volume
16
Number
9
Start Page
1019
End Page
1030
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/141192
DOI
10.1177/1747493020941273
ISSN
1747-4930
Abstract
Background: In PreventIon of CArdiovascular Events in Ischaemic Stroke Patients with High Risk of Cerebral HaemOrrhage (PICASSO), cilostazol versus aspirin was comparable for the end points of cerebral hemorrhage and major vascular events. However, underlying hemorrhage-prone lesions could modify the treatment effect. Aims: We explored whether the safety and efficacy of cilostazol versus aspirin would differ between hemorrhage-prone lesions (multiple cerebral microbleeds vs. prior intracerebral hemorrhage). Methods: In this post hoc analysis of PICASSO, we divided patients into the cerebral microbleeds and prior intracerebral hemorrhage subgroups. The primary safety end point was the first occurrence of cerebral hemorrhage. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. Results: Of 1512 patients, 903 (59.7%) had multiple cerebral microbleeds and 609 (40.3%) had prior intracerebral hemorrhage. The cerebral hemorrhage risk was lower with cilostazol versus aspirin (0.12%/year vs. 1.49%/year; hazard ratio, 0.08 [95% confidence interval 0.01-0.60];p = 0.015) in the cerebral microbleeds subgroup, but was not different (1.26%/year vs. 0.79%/year; hazards ratio 1.60 [0.52-4.90];p = 0.408) in the prior intracerebral hemorrhage subgroup. The interaction of treatment-by-subgroup was significant (p(interaction) = 0.011). For the composite of major vascular events, there was a trend toward a lower risk with cilostazol versus aspirin (3.56%/year vs. 5.53%/year; hazards ratio 0.64 [0.41-1.01];p = 0.056) in the cerebral microbleeds subgroup, but was comparable (5.21%/year vs. 5.05%/year; hazards ratio 1.03 [0.63-1.67];p = 0.913) in the prior intracerebral hemorrhage subgroup without a significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction (p(interaction) = 0.165). Conclusions: Cilostazol versus aspirin might be a better option in ischemic stroke with multiple cerebral microbleeds, ut confirmatory trials are needed.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE