A Debate on Public Health Responses to COVID-19: Focused Protection versus Sustained Suppression
- Authors
- Song, Joon Young; Peck, Kyong Ran
- Issue Date
- 21-12월-2020
- Publisher
- KOREAN ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
- Keywords
- Public Health Response; Pandemics; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19
- Citation
- JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, v.35, no.49
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
- Journal Title
- JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
- Volume
- 35
- Number
- 49
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/50779
- DOI
- 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e433
- ISSN
- 1011-8934
- Abstract
- With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic persisting for a long time, there have been debates about the public health response strategies. We conducted a survey of adult infectious disease specialists on public health responses to COVID-19. Most responded that regulations on multi-use facilities should be maintained or strengthened, but schools should not be closed, except in cases where an outbreak occurs within the school. A slightly higher percentage of experts supported focused protection rather than sustained suppression. While the focused protection strategy might suffice in low-level epidemic situations, social distancing should be reinforced by shifting to a strategy closer to sustained suppression in the eventuality of rapid spread of outbreaks.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.