Detailed Information

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Multilayered Costal Cartilage Graft for Nasal Dorsal Augmentation

Authors
Namgoong, SikKim, SoobynSuh, Man-Koon
Issue Date
12월-2020
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Asian rhinoplasty; Dorsal augmentation; Rib cartilage graft; Multilayered graft
Citation
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, v.44, no.6, pp.2185 - 2196
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY
Volume
44
Number
6
Start Page
2185
End Page
2196
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/51326
DOI
10.1007/s00266-020-01712-3
ISSN
0364-216X
Abstract
Background Nasal dorsal augmentation is one of the most commonly performed rhinoplasty procedures in Asia. We describe our experience with multilayered costal cartilage grafting (MCG) for dorsal augmentation in Asian patients. We aimed to evaluate the aesthetic outcomes and complications of MCG in comparison with those of one-block concentric carving costal cartilage graft (OCG) using objective and subjective assessment criteria. Methods Eighty-two consecutive patients who underwent dorsal augmentation with OCG (n = 39) or MCG (n = 43) by a single surgeon between November 2010 and September 2018 with > 12 months of follow-up were included in this retrospective cohort study. The aesthetic outcomes, which were determined by both anthropometric analysis and consensus decision, were compared. Patients' satisfaction and postoperative complications were also analyzed. Results Dorsal height ratios and radix height ratios increased significantly by 14.0% and 19.4%, respectively, after the OCG technique (p < 0.001) and by 13.5% and 19.0%, respectively, after the MCG technique (p < 0.001). Anthropometric comparison revealed that OCG did not show any significant differences in dorsal height ratio (p = 0.707) and radix height ratio (p = 0.856) postoperatively when compared with MCG. However, the warping rate was higher in the OCG (15.4%) than in the MCG (4.7%) group, although not significantly. There were no differences in overall patient satisfaction between the two groups. Conclusions Dorsal augmentation with MCG produces similar aesthetic outcomes but a lower warping rate than that with OCG. The MCG technique may minimize graft warping and thus might be an effective alternative for nasal dorsal augmentation, particularly in Asian rhinoplasty.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE