Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration

Authors
Paez, DiegoFilion, YvesCastro-Gama, MarioQuintiliani, ClaudiaSantopietro, SimoneSweetapple, ChrisMeng, FanlinFarmani, RaziyehFu, GuangtaoButler, DavidZhang, QingzhouZheng, FeifeiDiao, KegongUlanicki, BogumilHuang, YuanDeuerlein, JochenGilbert, DenisAbraham, EdoPiller, OlivierBalut, AlicjaBrodziak, RafalBylka, JedrzejZakrzewski, PrzemyslawLi, YuanzheGao, JinliangJian, CaiOu, ChenhaoHu, ShiyuanSophocleous, SophoclesNikoloudi, EiriniMahmoud, HermanWoodward, KevinRomano, MicheleSantonastaso, Giovanni FrancescoCreaco, EnricoDi Nardo, ArmandoDi Natale, MicheleBibok, AttilaSalcedo, CamiloAguilar, AndresCuero, PaulaGonzalez, SebastianMunoz, SergioPerez, JorgePosada, AlejandraRobles, JulianaVargas, KevinFranchini, MarcoGalelli, StefanoKim, Joong HoonIglesias-Rey, PedroKapelan, ZoranSaldarriaga, JuanSavic, DraganWalski, Thomas
Issue Date
1-8월-2020
Publisher
ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
Citation
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, v.146, no.8
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
Volume
146
Number
8
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/53817
DOI
10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001239
ISSN
0733-9496
Abstract
The paper presents the results of the Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration (BPDRR) presented in a special session at the first International water distribution systems analysis & computing and control in the water industry (WDSA/CCWI) Joint Conference, held in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, in July 2018. The BPDRR problem focused on how to respond and restore water service after the occurrence of five earthquake scenarios that cause structural damage in a water distribution system. Participants were required to propose a prioritization schedule to fix the damages of each scenario while following restrictions on visibility/nonvisibility of damages. Each team/approach was evaluated against six performance criteria: (1) time without supply for hospital/firefighting, (2) rapidity of recovery, (3) resilience loss, (4) average time of no user service, (5) number of users without service for eight consecutive hours, and (6) water loss. Three main types of approaches were identified from the submissions: (1) general-purpose metaheuristic algorithms, (2) greedy algorithms, and (3) ranking-based prioritizations. All three approaches showed potential to solve the challenge efficiently. The results of the participants showed that for this network, the impact of a large-diameter pipe failure on the network is more significant than several smaller pipes failures. The location of isolation valves and the size of hydraulic segments influenced the resilience of the system during emergencies. On average, the interruptions to water supply (hospitals and firefighting) varied considerably among solutions and emergency scenarios, highlighting the importance of private water storage for emergencies. The effects of damages and repair work were more noticeable during the peak demand periods (morning and noontime) than during the low-flow periods; and tank storage helped to preserve functionality of the network in the first few hours after a simulated event. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Engineering > School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE