Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A prospective randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and compliance of oral sulfate solution and 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol

Authors
Kwon, Ki HwanLee, Ji AeLim, Yun JeongLee, Beom JaeJoo, Moon KyungSim, Yu RaChoi, WonjaeKim, TaehyunKim, Ji YoonCho, Ei RieJeen, Yoon TaePark, Jong-Jae
Issue Date
7월-2020
Publisher
KOREAN ASSOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
Keywords
Ascorbic acid; Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Oral sulfate solution; Polyethylene glycols
Citation
KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, v.35, no.4, pp.873 - 880
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume
35
Number
4
Start Page
873
End Page
880
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/54471
DOI
10.3904/kjim.2017.275
ISSN
1226-3303
Abstract
Background/Aims: Oral sulfate solution (OSS) is an emerging cleansing agent for bowel preparation. However, data comparing OSS to other conventional bowel preparations in Asian patients are limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of OSS to ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol (AA + PEG) in Asian patients. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel, investigator-blind study performed in two university hospitals in Korea. Bowel preparation efficacy was evaluated using both the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS) and Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Results: Among 173 patients, 86 received OSS while 87 received AA + PEG for bowel preparation. Total OBPS score was 2.80 +/- 2.48 in the OSS group and 4.49 +/- 3.08 in the AA + PEG group, indicating significantly (p < 0.001) better efficacy with OSS. Total BBPS was higher in the OSS group (7.43 +/- 1.49 vs. 6.51 +/- 1.76, p < 0.001), indicating superior bowel preparation quality with OSS. Preparation-related adverse events were generally acceptable. Patients receiving OSS had more nausea (1.92 +/- 0.94 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.76, p = 0.004) and abdominal cramping (1.45 +/- 0.78 vs. 1.17 +/- 0.51, p = 0.006) than those receiving AA + PEG. However, overall satisfaction and taste were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: OSS had a non-inferior bowel cleansing efficacy than AA + PEG regardless of colon segment.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Jong Jae photo

Park, Jong Jae
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE