Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison Between Perfusion- and Collateral-Based Triage for Endovascular Thrombectomy in a Late Time Window

Authors
Kim, ByungjunJung, CheolkyuNam, Hyo SukKim, Byung MoonKim, Young DaeHeo, Ji HoeKim, Dong JoonKim, Jun-HweeHan, KyunghwaKim, Jae HyoungKim, Beom Joon
Issue Date
12월-2019
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Keywords
computed tomography angiography; humans; outcome and process assessment (health care); perfusion; thrombectomy
Citation
STROKE, v.50, no.12, pp.3465 - 3470
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
STROKE
Volume
50
Number
12
Start Page
3465
End Page
3470
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/61507
DOI
10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027216
ISSN
0039-2499
Abstract
Background and Purpose-Perfusion-based triage has proven to be effective and safe for selecting patients who are likely to benefit from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in a late time window. We investigated collateral-based triage for EVT in patients presenting beyond 6 hours, in terms of interrater reliability and efficacy in predicting clinical outcome, in comparison to perfusion-based triage. Methods-One hundred and thirty-two patients who underwent both computed tomographic angiography and computed tomography perfusion for anterior circulation large artery occlusion 6 to 24 hours after last seen well were enrolled. Patients were classified into EVT-eligible and EVT-ineligible groups according to perfusion- and collateral-based triages. We evaluated the interrater reliability of collateral-based triage and differences in good outcome rates of patients who received EVT in the EVT-eligible groups based on perfusion- and collateral-based triages. Results-Both computed tomographic angiography and computed tomography perfusion were assessable in 93 patients. Seventy-six patients were eligible for EVT according to perfusion-based triage. Among them, EVT was performed in 58, of whom 32 (55.1%) had good outcome. Sixty-nine patients were eligible for EVT based on collateral-based triage. Among them, EVT was performed in 50 patients, of whom 31 (62.0%) had good outcome. Interrater reliability of collateral-based triage was good (generalized kappa=0.73 [95% CI, 0.59-0.84]). Agreement on EVT eligibility between perfusion- and collateral-based triages was moderate (kappa=0.41 [95% CI, 0.16-0.61]). There was no difference in good outcome rates of patients who underwent EVT in the EVT-eligible groups based on perfusion- and collateral-based triages (55.1% versus 62.0%; P=0.0675). Conclusions-Collateral-based triage showed good interrater reliability and comparable efficacy to that of perfusion-based triage in predicting clinical outcome after EVT in patients presenting beyond 6 hours. Collateral-based triage is a reliable approach for selecting patients for EVT in the extended therapeutic time window.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE