Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Detailed Comparison of the Operational Characteristics of Energy-Conserving HVAC Systems during the Cooling Season

Authors
Kim, Chul-HoLee, Seung-EonLee, Kwang-HoKim, Kang-Soo
Issue Date
11월-2019
Publisher
MDPI
Keywords
energy-conserving HVAC systems; variable air volume (VAV); underfloor air distribution (UFAD); active chilled beam (ACB) with dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS); EnergyPlus; primary energy consumption; CO2 emissions
Citation
ENERGIES, v.12, no.21
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ENERGIES
Volume
12
Number
21
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/62060
DOI
10.3390/en12214160
ISSN
1996-1073
Abstract
To provide useful information concerning energy-conserving heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, this study used EnergyPlus to analyze in detail their operational characteristics and energy performance. This study also aimed to understand the features of the systems under consideration by investigating the dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity, and airflow rate at major nodes in each system's schematic. Furthermore, we analyzed the indoor environment created by each HVAC system, as well as examining the cooling energy consumptions and CO2 emissions. The HVAC systems selected for this study are the variable air volume (VAV) commonly used in office buildings (base-case model), constant air volume (CAV), under-floor air distribution (UFAD), and active chilled beam (ACB) with dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS). For the same indoor set-point temperature, the CAV's supply airflow was the highest, and VAV and UFAD were operated by varying the airflow rate according to the change of the space thermal load. ACB with DOAS was analyzed as being able to perform air conditioning only with the supply airflow constantly fixed at a minimum outdoor air volume. The primary cooling energy was increased by about 23.3% by applying CAV, compared to VAV. When using the UFAD and ACB with DOAS, cooling energy was reduced by 11.3% and 23.1% compared with VAV, respectively.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Engineering > Department of Architecture > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE