Why Do States Adopt Truth Commissions After Transition?
- Authors
- Kim, Hun Joon
- Issue Date
- 8월-2019
- Publisher
- WILEY
- Citation
- SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, v.100, no.5, pp.1485 - 1502
- Indexed
- SSCI
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY
- Volume
- 100
- Number
- 5
- Start Page
- 1485
- End Page
- 1502
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/63644
- DOI
- 10.1111/ssqu.12646
- ISSN
- 0038-4941
- Abstract
- Objectives Why do states create a truth commission after political transition? This article answers this question by testing three key theories after surveying the existing literature: transnational advocacy networks, the balance of power between old and new elites, and diffusion theory. Methods Cox proportional hazards models were used to explain the adoption of a truth commission. I used the Transitional Justice Database Project database on truth commissions in 71 countries that became democracies between 1980 and 2006. Result Strong evidence supports transnational advocacy networks and diffusion explanations. First, active domestic and international advocacy is a key factor. Second, diffusion theory is supported, as establishing a truth commission in neighboring countries is a relevant factor. Transitional countries are most sensitive to truth commissions adopted in culturally similar countries. Conclusion I found empirical evidence supporting the relevance of diffusion, domestic advocacy groups, and international actors.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Political Science & Economics > Department of Political Science and International Relations > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.