Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Why Do States Adopt Truth Commissions After Transition?

Authors
Kim, Hun Joon
Issue Date
8월-2019
Publisher
WILEY
Citation
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, v.100, no.5, pp.1485 - 1502
Indexed
SSCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY
Volume
100
Number
5
Start Page
1485
End Page
1502
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/63644
DOI
10.1111/ssqu.12646
ISSN
0038-4941
Abstract
Objectives Why do states create a truth commission after political transition? This article answers this question by testing three key theories after surveying the existing literature: transnational advocacy networks, the balance of power between old and new elites, and diffusion theory. Methods Cox proportional hazards models were used to explain the adoption of a truth commission. I used the Transitional Justice Database Project database on truth commissions in 71 countries that became democracies between 1980 and 2006. Result Strong evidence supports transnational advocacy networks and diffusion explanations. First, active domestic and international advocacy is a key factor. Second, diffusion theory is supported, as establishing a truth commission in neighboring countries is a relevant factor. Transitional countries are most sensitive to truth commissions adopted in culturally similar countries. Conclusion I found empirical evidence supporting the relevance of diffusion, domestic advocacy groups, and international actors.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Political Science & Economics > Department of Political Science and International Relations > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher KIM, Hun Joon photo

KIM, Hun Joon
정경대학 (정치외교학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE