Process maturity models: Classification by application sectors and validities studies
- Authors
- Lee, Donghun; Gu, Ja-Whan; Jung, Ho-Won
- Issue Date
- 4월-2019
- Publisher
- WILEY
- Keywords
- mapping study; maturity models; model building; model testing; validity
- Citation
- JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, v.31, no.4
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS
- Volume
- 31
- Number
- 4
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/66490
- DOI
- 10.1002/smr.2161
- ISSN
- 2047-7481
- Abstract
- A variety of maturity models have been developed and evolved as a tool for assessments/benchmarking and continuous improvements for the past two decades. The rapidly increasing number of maturity models led to problems in locating proper maturity models and identifying model validities. To identify maturity models and their validities as well as a classification of models across industrial sectors, a mapping study was applied to initially retrieved 2381 articles on maturity models published in peer-reviewed journals between 1993 and June 2015. We identified 194 maturity models from 285 articles using a set of quality assessment steps. Among those maturity models, besides the five partially validated ones, this study also identified 26 maturity models that were empirically tested on the basis of tested hypotheses and associated validity types, such as predictive validity and unidimensionality. Additionally, despite the wide presence of maturity models in most application sectors, validated models were observed only in five sectors, eg, IT, industrials, and general. Practitioners and researchers as well as standard organizations can utilize our results to find out maturity models meeting their needs, to identify their validities, and/or to seek research opportunities.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - Korea University Business School > Department of Business Administration > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.