朱熹 ≪詩集傳≫ <鄭風⋅女曰雞鳴> 新舊傳 비교 연구A Comparative Study on the Annotations of Zhengfeng Nüyuejiming in the Old and New Versions of Zhu Xi’s Shijizhuan
- Other Titles
- A Comparative Study on the Annotations of Zhengfeng Nüyuejiming in the Old and New Versions of Zhu Xi’s Shijizhuan
- Authors
- 이재훈
- Issue Date
- 2019
- Publisher
- 중국어문연구회
- Keywords
- Zhu Xi; The Book of Odes; Shijizhuan(詩集傳); Zhengfeng(鄭風); Nüyuejiming(女曰雞鳴); Shiguxunzhuan(詩故訓傳); Shixu(詩序); Maoshizhuanjian(毛詩傳箋)
- Citation
- 중국어문논총, no.95, pp.243 - 274
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 중국어문논총
- Number
- 95
- Start Page
- 243
- End Page
- 274
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/69030
- DOI
- 10.26586/chls.2019..95.009
- ISSN
- 1226-4555
- Abstract
- This paper is one of the series of basic research for comparative studies of Zhu Xi’s earlier and later views on The Book of Odes, and represents the third comparative study on Zhengfeng(鄭風).
This paper will examine the specific similarities and differences through the comparison of the currently lost articles of the second version of Shijizhuan(詩集傳), and the annotations of the currently existing third version of Shijizhuan.
First and foremost, this paper collected the currently lost articles of the second version of Shijizhuan – Nüyuejiming(女曰雞鳴) of Zhengfeng - from Lü Zuqian’s Lüshijiashu Dushiji(呂氏家塾讀詩記), Zhen Dexiu’s Xishan Dushuji(西山讀書記), Duan Changwu’s Maoshijijie(毛詩集解), and Yan Can’s Shiji(詩緝).
The collection of these articles will be explained in detail in comparison with the views of Mao Heng’s Shiguxunzhuan(詩故訓傳) and Shixu(詩序), Zheng Xuan’s Maoshizhuanjian(毛詩傳箋), and the third version of Shijizhuan.
Through this comparison, this paper will examine how Zhu Xi comprehended the words, lines and stanzas as well as the themes of the poetry in the second and third versions, and then will examine how Zhu Xi either accepted or not the views of Shiguxunzhuan, Shixu, and Maoshizhuanjian.
Afterward, this paper will elaborate on why Zhu Xi adopted the annotations and the expositions of the second version in the third version. Furthermore, this paper attempts to restore the second version to its original form through the comparison of the annotations or the expositions of the second and third versions. It is also assumed that there may be a printed edition of the second version, based on the fact that there exist many differences in letters or contents in the annotations of the second version mentioned in the works of many scholars.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Liberal Arts > Department of Chinese Language and Literature > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.