Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

상악 전치의 치열 형태에 따른 스캔 반복 측정 안정성 평가: in vitro 연구Evaluation of repeated measurement stability of dentition type of maxillary anterior tooth: an in vitro study

Other Titles
Evaluation of repeated measurement stability of dentition type of maxillary anterior tooth: an in vitro study
Authors
김지환박동인손호정김웅철
Issue Date
2019
Publisher
대한치과기공학회
Keywords
Scanning repeatability; Digitalize; Maxillary arch; Abnormal dentition
Citation
대한치과기공학회지, v.41, no.3, pp.211 - 217
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
대한치과기공학회지
Volume
41
Number
3
Start Page
211
End Page
217
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/69665
ISSN
1229-3954
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the repeated measurement stability of scans related to dentition type. Methods: A normal model and the crowding and diastema models are also duplicated using duplicating silicon. After that, a plaster model is made using a plaster-type plaster on the duplicate mold, and each model is scanned 5 times by using an extraoral scanner. The gingival part and molar part were deleted from the 3D STL file data obtained through scanning. Using the 3D stl file obtained in this way, data is nested between model groups. Thereafter, RMS values obtained were compared and evaluated. The normality test of the data was performed for the statistical application of repeated measurements with dentition type, and the normality was satisfied. Therefore, the one-way ANOVA test, which is a parametric statistical method, was applied, and post-tests were processed by the Scheffe method. Results: The average size of each RMS in the Normal, Diastema, and Crowding groups was Normal> Crowding> Diastema. However, the standard deviation was in the order of Crowding> Normal> Diastema. The average value of each data is as follows. Diastema model was the smallest (5.51 ± 0.55 μm), followed by the crowding model (12.30 ± 2.50 μm). The normal model showed the maximum error (13.23 ± 1.06μm). Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference in the repeatability of the scanning measurements according to the dentition type. Therefore, you should be more careful when scanning the normal intense or crowded dentition than scanning the interdental lining. However, this error value was within the range of applicable errors for all clinical cases.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Health Sciences > Division of Health Policy and Management > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Ji Hwan photo

Kim, Ji Hwan
보건과학대학 (보건정책관리학부)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE