체육지도자 양성제도 개선을 위한 정책 논의과정에서의 전문가 역할 변화 탐색

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to understand the role of expert in the process of discussing system and policy, and the implications of the policies. To achieve this purpose, the selected case was the discussion process for improving the training system for sports instructor in 2013. The case was the first study since the National Sports Promotion Act was revised in 2012. The process of this discussion required practical measures to be presented and various interests and complex policy issues to be addressed. Therefore, the researchers determined that the case is suitable for exploring the policy process and the role of policy experts. Following Yanow's interpretative policy analysis procedures, the researcher analyzed policy artifact including policy documents and minutes, and conducted in-depth interviews with experts involved in the discussion process. The result showed that the training system for sports leaders included value from policy experts. It is the improvement of status of sports leader and the fairness of the training procedure. The role of policy experts and behavior of policy discussions have also changed. The role of and expert was changed from 1) an 'expert' who demonstrates an individual’s professional knowledge and experience to 2) a 'representative’ of a detailed major group, and 3) a 'hidden benefactor' at the end. The context reflected in the turning point was revealed by the academic identity of the expert and the path dependence of the system.