Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention

Authors
Byun, Jae KyeongChoi, Byoung GeolRha, Seung-WoonChoi, Se YeonJeong, Myung Ho
Issue Date
10월-2018
Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
Keywords
Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors; Angiotensin II receptor blockers; Diabetes mellitus; Myocardial infarction; Non-ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction
Citation
ATHEROSCLEROSIS, v.277, pp.130 - 135
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume
277
Start Page
130
End Page
135
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/72568
DOI
10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.08.038
ISSN
0021-9150
Abstract
Background and aims: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) are known to be beneficial for either non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients or diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. However, the comparative efficacy of ACEI versus ARB in patients with NSTEMI and DM is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the protective efficacy of ACEI versus ARB in patients with NSTEMI and DM, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). Methods: Among 53,281 patients enrolled in the nationwide Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry, 3426 patients with NSTEMI and DM, who were treated with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, had undergone successful PCI with DESs. They were classified into two groups: ACEI group (N = 2076), and ARB group (N = 1350). Individual major clinical outcomes and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), the composite of total death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization were compared between the two groups for up to two years. Results: After propensity score-matching analysis, two propensity-matched groups (1103 pairs, total = 2206) were generated, and the baseline characteristics were balanced. Although all causes of death and recurrent MI were not different between the two groups, the incidence of revascularization (4.0% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.002), including target vessel (2.3% vs. 5.0; p = 0.002), and MACE (8.7% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.008), were lower in the ACEI group than the ARB group at two-year follow-up. Conclusions: Compared with ARB, no beneficial effects of ACEI on all causes of death, cardiac death, or recurrence of MI were observed, but ACEI reduced the incidence of revascularization and MACE in this population. Thus, well-designed trials with a larger population are needed to confirm these results.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Biomedical Sciences > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Rha, Seung Woon photo

Rha, Seung Woon
의과학과
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE