Appropriate doses of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in high-risk subgroups with atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis
- Authors
- Kim, In-Soo; Kim, Hyun-Jung; Kim, Tae-Hoon; Uhm, Jae-Sun; Joung, Boyoung; Lee, Moon-Hyoung; Pak, Hui-Nam
- Issue Date
- 9월-2018
- Publisher
- ELSEVIER
- Keywords
- Atrial fibrillation; Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; Oral anticoagulant-nayve; Previous stroke; Meta-analysis
- Citation
- JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, v.72, no.3-4, pp.284 - 291
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- Volume
- 72
- Number
- 3-4
- Start Page
- 284
- End Page
- 291
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/73240
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.03.009
- ISSN
- 0914-5087
- Abstract
- Background: We evaluated the dose-dependent efficacy, safety, and all-cause mortality of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in "atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who were OAC-naive," or "AF patients with prior-stroke history" with those who were known to be high-risk subgroups under OAC. Methods: After a systematic database search (Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), five phase-III randomized trials comparing NOACs and warfarin in "OAC-naive/OAC-experienced," or "with/without prior-stroke history" subgroups were included. The outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model to determine the relative risk (RR) for stroke/systemic thromboembolism (SSTE), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality. Results: 1. In OAC-naive patients, standard-dose NOACs showed superior efficacy and safety with lower mortality [RR 0.90 (0.84-0.97), p = 0.008, I-2 = 0%] compared to warfarin. 2. For OAC-experienced patients, low-dose NOACs showed equivalent efficacy but reduced risk of major bleeding [RR 0.61 (0.40-0.91), p = 0.02, I-2 = 89%], and had lower all-cause mortality [RR 0.86 (0.75-0.99), p = 0.04, I-2 = 38%] compared to warfarin. 3. For patients with prior-stroke history, low-dose NOACs showed equivalent efficacy, but reduced risk of major bleeding [RR 0.58 (0.48-0.70), p < 0.001, I-2 = 0%] and all-cause mortality [RR 0.76 (0.66-0.88), p < 0.001, I-2 = 0%] compared to warfarin. 4. Among patients without prior-stroke history, standard-dose NOAC was superior to warfarin for both SSTE prevention [RR 0.78 (0.66-0.91), p = 0.002, I-2= 43%] and all-cause mortality [RR 0.91 (0.850.97), p = 0.004, I-2 = 0%]. Conclusions: In conclusion, standard-dose NOAC showed lower all-cause mortality than warfarin in OACnaive patients with AF, and low-dose NOAC was better than warfarin among the patients with prior stroke history in terms of all-cause mortality. (C) 2018 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - ETC > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.