SIRveNIB: Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Versus Sorafenib in Asia-Pacific Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Authors
- Chow, Pierce K. H.; Gandhi, Mihir; Tan, Say-Beng; Khin, Maung Win; Khasbazar, Ariunaa; Ong, Janus; Choo, Su Pin; Cheow, Peng Chung; Chotipanich, Chanisa; Lim, Kieron; Lesmana, Laurentius A.; Manuaba, Tjakra W.; Yoong, Boon Koon; Raj, Aloysius; Law, Chiong Soon; Cua, Ian H. Y.; Lobo, Rolley R.; Teh, Catherine S. C.; Kim, Yun Hwan; Jong, Yun Won; Han, Ho-Seong; Bae, Si-Hyun; Yoon, Hyun-Ki; Lee, Rheun-Chuan; Hung, Chien-Fu; Peng, Cheng-Yuan; Liang, Po-Chin; Bartlett, Adam; Kok, Kenneth Y. Y.; Thng, Choon-Hua; Low, Albert Su-Chong; Goh, Anthony S. W.; Tay, Kiang Hiong; Lo, Richard H. G.; Goh, Brian K. P.; Ng, David C. E.; Lekurwale, Ganesh; Liew, Wei Ming; Gebski, Val; Mak, Kenneth S. W.; Soo, Khee Chee
- Issue Date
- 1-7월-2018
- Publisher
- AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Citation
- JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, v.36, no.19, pp.1913 - +
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Volume
- 36
- Number
- 19
- Start Page
- 1913
- End Page
- +
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/74390
- DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.0892
- ISSN
- 0732-183X
- Abstract
- PurposeSelective internal radiation therapy or radioembolization (RE) shows efficacy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) limited to the liver. This study compared the safety and efficacy of RE and sorafenib in patients with locally advanced HCC.Patients and MethodsSIRveNIB (selective internal radiation therapy v sorafenib), an open-label, investigator-initiated, phase III trial, compared yttrium-90 (Y-90) resin microspheres RE with sorafenib 800 mg/d in patients with locally advanced HCC in a two-tailed study designed for superiority/detriment. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 and stratified by center and presence of portal vein thrombosis. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Efficacy analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses in the treated population.ResultsA total of 360 patients were randomly assigned (RE, 182; sorafenib, 178) from 11 countries in the Asia-Pacific region. In the RE and sorafenib groups, 28.6% and 9.0%, respectively, failed to receive assigned therapy without significant cross-over to either group. Median OS was 8.8 and 10.0 months with RE and sorafenib, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4; P = .36). A total of 1,468 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported (RE, 437; sorafenib, 1,031). Significantly fewer patients in the RE than sorafenib group had grade 3 AEs (36 of 130 [27.7%]) v 82 of 162 [50.6%]; P < .001). The most common grade 3 AEs were ascites (five of 130 [3.8%] v four of 162 [2.5%] patients), abdominal pain (three [2.3%] v two [1.2%] patients), anemia (zero v four [2.5%] patients), and radiation hepatitis (two [1.5%] v zero [0%] patients). Fewer patients in the RE group (27 of 130 [20.8%]) than in the sorafenib group (57 of 162 [35.2%]) had serious AEs.ConclusionIn patients with locally advanced HCC, OS did not differ significantly between RE and sorafenib. The improved toxicity profile of RE may inform treatment choice in selected patients.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.