Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Aggressive intravenous hydration with lactated Ringer's solution for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial

Authors
Park, Chang-HwanPaik, Woo HyunPark, Eun TaekShim, Chan SupLee, Tae YoonKang, ChangdonNoh, Myung HwanYi, Sun YounLee, Jong KyunHyun, Jong JinLee, Jun Kyu
Issue Date
4월-2018
Publisher
GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
Citation
ENDOSCOPY, v.50, no.4, pp.378 - 385
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ENDOSCOPY
Volume
50
Number
4
Start Page
378
End Page
385
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/76186
DOI
10.1055/s-0043-122386
ISSN
0013-726X
Abstract
Background and study aims The present study aimed to determine the type of intravenous hydration that is best suited to reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. Patients and methods In a prospective randomized multicenter trial, average-to-high risk patients who underwent first-time ERCP were randomly assigned to three groups (1: 1: 1) who received: aggressive intravenous hydration (3 mL/kg/h during ERCP, a 20-mL/kg bolus and 3 mL/kg/h for 8 hours after ERCP) with either lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) or normal saline solution (NSS), or standard intravenous hydration with LRS (1.5 mL/kg/h during and for 8 hours after ERCP). The primary end point was post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Results 395 patients were enrolled, and 385 completed the protocols. The three groups showed no significant differences in demographic characteristics. There was a significant difference in the intention-to-treat (ITT) PEP rate between the aggressive LRS group (3.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1%-5.9%; 4/132), the aggressive NSS group (6.7 %, 95% CI 2.5%-10.9 %; 9/134) and the standard LRS group (11.6%, 95% CI 6.1%-17.2%; 15/129; P=0.03). In the two-group comparisons, the ITT PEP rate was significantly lower for the aggressive LRS group than for the standard LRS group (relative risk [RR] 0.26, 95 % CI 0.08 0.76; P = 0.008). There was no significant difference in the ITT PEP rate between the aggressive NSS group and the standard LRS group (RR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.26 -1.27; P=0.17). Conclusion Aggressive hydration with LRS is the best approach to intravenous hydration for the prevention of PEP in average-to-high risk patients.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE