How Team-Level and Individual-Level Conflict Influences Team Commitment: A Multilevel Investigation
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Sanghyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwon, Seungwoo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, Shung J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, MinSoo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, In-Jo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-02T16:08:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-02T16:08:05Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-16 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-01-17 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-1078 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/77957 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We investigate how two different types of conflict (task conflict and relationship conflict) at two different levels (individual-level and team-level) influence individual team commitment. The analysis was conducted using data we collected from 193 employees in 31 branch offices of a Korean commercial bank. The relationships at multiple levels were tested using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). The results showed that individual-level relationship conflict was negatively related to team commitment while individual-level task conflict was not. In addition, both team-level task and relationship conflict were negatively associated with team commitment. Finally, only team-level relationship conflict significantly moderated the relationship between individual-level relationship conflict and team commitment. We further derive theoretical implications of these findings. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | FRONTIERS MEDIA SA | - |
dc.subject | STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING | - |
dc.subject | TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS | - |
dc.subject | INTRAGROUP CONFLICT | - |
dc.subject | TASK CONFLICT | - |
dc.subject | DIALECTICAL INQUIRY | - |
dc.subject | CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE | - |
dc.subject | DEVILS ADVOCACY | - |
dc.subject | PERFORMANCE | - |
dc.subject | OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject | DIVERSITY | - |
dc.title | How Team-Level and Individual-Level Conflict Influences Team Commitment: A Multilevel Investigation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kwon, Seungwoo | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02365 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85040866606 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000422691700001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, v.8 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.title | FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 8 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Psychology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Psychology, Multidisciplinary | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INTRAGROUP CONFLICT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TASK CONFLICT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIALECTICAL INQUIRY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DEVILS ADVOCACY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PERFORMANCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIVERSITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | individual-level conflict | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | team-level conflict | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | task conflict | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | relationship conflict | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | team commitment | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | multilevel analysis | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.