Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing successful revascularization

Authors
Park, Keun-HoJeong, Myung HoKim, Hyun KukAhn, Tae HoonSeung, Ki BaeOh, Dong JooChoi, Dong-JooKim, Hyo-SooGwon, Hyeon CheolSeong, In WhanHwang, Kyung KukChae, Shung ChullKim, Kwon-BaeKim, Young JoCha, Kwang SooOh, Seok KyuChae, Jei Keon
Issue Date
Jan-2018
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Keywords
Myocardial infarction; Clopidogrel; Prasugrel; Koreans
Citation
JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, v.71, no.1-2, pp.36 - 43
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume
71
Number
1-2
Start Page
36
End Page
43
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/78401
DOI
10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.05.003
ISSN
0914-5087
Abstract
Background: Although there have been several reports that prasugrel can improve clinical outcomes, the efficacy and safety of prasugrel is unknown in Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing successful revascularization. Methods: A total of 4421 patients [637 patients were prescribed prasugrel (60/10 or 5 mg, loading/maintenance dose) and 3784 patients clopidogrel (600 or 300/75 mg)] with AMI undergoing successful revascularization were enrolled from the core clinical cohort of Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health. Results: After propensity score matching (637 pairs), there were no significant differences in baseline clinical and procedural characteristics and in-hospital medications between the two groups. The primary efficacy endpoint, defined as the composite of cardiac death, MI, stroke, or target vessel revascularization at 6 months showed no significant difference between prasugrel and clopidogrel (2.4% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.593). Also, no difference was observed in the composite of cardiac death, MI, or stroke during hospitalization between two groups (0.8% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.762). However, the incidence of in-hospital Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major or minor bleeding was significantly higher in prasugrel compared with clopidogrel (5.3% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.015). In multivariate linear regression analysis, trans-femoral intervention, use of glycoprotein Ilb/Illa inhibitors, use of calcium channel blocker, and use of prasugrel were independent predictors of in-hospital TIMI major or minor bleeding [odds ratio (OR) = 6.918; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.453-19.510, OR = 2.577; 95% CI = 1.406-4.724, OR = 4.016; 95% CI = 1.382-11.668, OR = 2.022; 95% CI = 1.101-3.714]. Conclusions: Our study shows that the recommended dose of prasugrel had significantly higher in hospital bleeding complications without reducing ischemic events compared with clopidogrel. However, further large-scale, long-term, randomized clinical trials are required to accurately assess the efficacy and safety of prasgurel and to find out the optimal dose for Korean AMI patients. (C) 2017 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE